Suppr超能文献

选择的动态:教程。

Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.

机构信息

University of California, Davis, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):161-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-161.

Abstract

Choice may be defined as the allocation of behavior among activities. Since all activities take up time, choice is conveniently thought of as the allocation of time among activities, even if activities like pecking are most easily measured by counting. Since dynamics refers to change through time, the dynamics of choice refers to change of allocation through time. In the dynamics of choice, as in other dynamical systems that include feedback, change is away from perturbation and toward a steady state. Steady state or equilibrium is assessed on a longer time scale than change because change is only visible on a smaller time scale. When we compare laws of equilibrium, such as the matching law with laws of dynamics, two possibilities emerge. Self-similarity occurs when the same law can be seen across smaller time scales, with the result that the law at longer time scales may be understood as the expression of its application at smaller time scales. Reduction occurs when the dynamics at a small time scale are incommensurate with the dynamics at longer time scales. Then the process at the longer time scale is reduced to a qualitatively different process at the smaller time scale, as when choice is reduced to switching patterns. When reduction occurs, the dynamics at the longer time scale may be derived from the process at the smaller time scale, but not the other way around. Research at different time scales is facilitated by the molar view of behavior.

摘要

选择可以定义为行为在活动之间的分配。由于所有活动都占用时间,选择可以方便地被视为活动之间时间的分配,即使像啄食这样的活动最容易通过计数来测量。由于动态是指随时间的变化,选择的动态是指随时间的分配变化。在选择的动态中,就像其他包括反馈的动力系统一样,变化是远离干扰并趋向于稳定状态。稳定状态或平衡是在更长的时间尺度上评估的,因为变化只能在更小的时间尺度上看到。当我们比较平衡定律,如匹配律与动力定律时,会出现两种可能性。自相似性是指在更小的时间尺度上可以看到相同的定律,其结果是,较长时间尺度上的定律可以被理解为其在较小时间尺度上的应用的表达。当较小时间尺度上的动力学与较长时间尺度上的动力学不相符时,就会发生简化。然后,较长时间尺度上的过程就简化为较小时间尺度上的定性不同的过程,就像选择简化为开关模式一样。当简化发生时,较长时间尺度上的动力学可以从较小时间尺度上的过程中推导出来,但反之则不行。不同时间尺度上的研究可以通过行为的摩尔观点来促进。

相似文献

1
Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.选择的动态:教程。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):161-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-161.
2
The logistics of choice.选择的逻辑
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jul;104(1):74-92. doi: 10.1002/jeab.156. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.效果律的动态:模型比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):91-127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-91.
7
Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.在动态环境中发展和维护选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):175-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-175.
8
Modeling the dynamics of choice.模拟选择的动态过程。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
9
Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons.鸽子的次优选择行为。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):412-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.412.

引用本文的文献

2
Toward a Procedure to Study Rule-Governed Choice: Preliminary Data.迈向一种研究规则支配选择的程序:初步数据。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2024 May 28;40(2):280-305. doi: 10.1007/s40616-024-00206-6. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices.选择与无选择:增加选择的实际考量
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):100-117. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2920. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
4
Punishment and its putative fallout: A reappraisal.惩罚及其可能的后果:再评价。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jan;115(1):185-203. doi: 10.1002/jeab.653. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
6
Moving Beyond Reinforcement and Response Strength.超越强化与反应强度
Behav Anal. 2017 Jun 19;40(1):107-121. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0092-y. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.多重计划中的行为动量与质量累积
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):437-49. doi: 10.1002/jeab.145. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Modeling the dynamics of choice.模拟选择的动态过程。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
6
Local effects of delayed food.延迟进食的局部影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.13-06.
7
Is matching innate?匹配是天生的吗?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):161-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.92-05.
8
Do conditional reinforcers count?条件强化物算数吗?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.
10
Choice, contingency discrimination, and foraging theory.选择、偶然性辨别与觅食理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):355-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-355.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验