Lin Peng-Chan, Wang Wei-Shu, Yang Muh-Hwa, Yen Chueh-Chuan, Chao Ta-Chung, Hsiao Liang-Tsai, Chen Po-Min
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2006 Jul;69(7):304-9. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70263-1.
Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Capecitabine or vinorelbine plus cisplatin is an effective palliative regimen for taxane-refractory MBC. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of sequential therapy with capecitabine followed by biweekly vinorelbine plus cisplatin in 37 patients with anthracycline and taxane-refractory MBC in Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
Capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest) was repeated every 3 weeks until the disease progressed. Patients then received biweekly vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2) (arm A, n = 17) or best supportive care (BSC) (arm B, n = 20) in accordance with patient preference and clinical judgment. The clinical variables and response to capecitabine were well balanced in both arms.
The overall response rate to capecitabine was 32%, with a complete response rate of 5% and a partial response rate of 27%. Stable disease was achieved in an additional 46%. The disease control rate with capecitabine was 78%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival with capecitabine were 5.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. There was a trend toward better overall survival in arm A patients compared with arm B (BSC) patients, though statistical significance was not reached (10.4 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.08); however, a significantly better overall survival rate was observed in the subgroup with capecitabine-controlled disease (10.8 vs. 6.9 months; p = 0.015). The safety profile of vinorelbine/cisplatin was acceptable: only 6% developed grade 4 neutropenia.
We suggest that sequential therapy is not necessarily effective compared with capecitabine alone, but is probably effective in patients initially controllable with capecitabine.
目前,对于蒽环类和紫杉类难治性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者尚无标准治疗方案。卡培他滨或长春瑞滨联合顺铂是治疗紫杉类难治性MBC的一种有效姑息治疗方案。在本研究中,我们分析了台北荣民总医院37例蒽环类和紫杉类难治性MBC患者采用卡培他滨序贯治疗,随后每两周给予长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗的疗效和毒性。
卡培他滨(2500mg/m²,每日2次,共2周,随后休息1周)每3周重复一次,直至疾病进展。然后根据患者偏好和临床判断,患者接受每两周一次的长春瑞滨(25mg/m²)联合顺铂(40mg/m²)治疗(A组,n = 17)或最佳支持治疗(BSC)(B组,n = 20)。两组的临床变量和对卡培他滨的反应情况良好平衡。
卡培他滨的总体缓解率为32%,完全缓解率为5%,部分缓解率为27%。另有46%的患者病情稳定。卡培他滨的疾病控制率为78%。卡培他滨治疗的无进展生存期和总生存期的中位数分别为5.9个月和9.5个月。与B组(BSC)患者相比,A组患者的总生存期有改善趋势,但未达到统计学显著性(10.4个月对7.4个月;p = 0.08);然而,在疾病得到卡培他滨控制的亚组中观察到总生存率有显著提高(10.8个月对6.9个月;p = 0.015)。长春瑞滨/顺铂的安全性可接受:仅6%的患者出现4级中性粒细胞减少。
我们认为,序贯治疗与单独使用卡培他滨相比不一定有效,但可能对最初能用卡培他滨控制病情的患者有效。