Suppr超能文献

女性急诊科患者的避孕措施使用情况、相关知识及使用的相关因素。

Contraceptive usage, knowledge and correlates of usage among female emergency department patients.

作者信息

Merchant Roland C, Damergis Jennifer A, Gee Erin M, Bock Beth C, Becker Bruce M, Clark Melissa A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2006 Sep;74(3):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 May 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

For female emergency department (ED) patients, we sought to assess the prevalence of contraceptive usage as well as the extent of contraceptive knowledge and to determine if demographic and sexual health history factors, comprehension of contraceptive methods and moral/religious opinions on contraception were associated with current usage of birth control pills (BCPs), prior usage of emergency contraception (EC) and frequency of condom usage.

METHODS

English-speaking female ED patients aged between 18 and 55 years at a northeastern United States urban ED were surveyed on their usage, comprehension and opinions regarding BCPs, EC and condoms.

RESULTS

Of the 539 respondents (64.6% were aged </=35 years), most were White (63.1%), single (42.5%), Catholic (48.4%) and privately insured (55.3%). Among the 223 women at pregnancy risk [not currently pregnant, not using any form of nonsurgical birth control (except condoms) and with no prior tubal ligation or hysterectomy], about 25% were using BCPs, fewer than 10% had used EC and almost 40% never used condoms. Most women displayed good knowledge about BCPs and condoms but poor understanding about EC. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, current BCP usage among women at risk of pregnancy was associated with younger age [odds ratio (OR)=0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.37-0.79], private insurance (OR=2.52; 95% CI=1.30-4.86) and recent intercourse (OR=1.61; 95% CI=1.19-2.18). Among women at risk of pregnancy, those who had an abortion (OR=2.56; 95% CI=1.17-5.61) and those who displayed greater EC knowledge (OR=3.23; 95% CI=1.50-6.95) had greater odds of having used EC. Among all women, more frequent condom usage was associated with being younger (OR=0.57; 95% CI=0.46-0.70), having never been married (OR=0.44; 95% CI=0.28-0.68) and not having intercourse recently (OR=0.79; 95% CI=0.64-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of female ED patients (41.4%) were at risk of pregnancy. Demographic and sexual history factors can help identify women who might benefit from receiving referrals or education on contraceptive measures.

摘要

目的

针对女性急诊科患者,我们试图评估避孕措施的使用情况、避孕知识的掌握程度,并确定人口统计学和性健康史因素、对避孕方法的理解以及对避孕的道德/宗教观点是否与当前口服避孕药(BCP)的使用、既往紧急避孕(EC)的使用以及避孕套的使用频率相关。

方法

在美国东北部城市急诊科,对年龄在18至55岁之间、说英语的女性急诊科患者进行了关于BCP、EC和避孕套的使用、理解及观点的调查。

结果

在539名受访者中(64.6%年龄≤35岁),大多数为白人(63.1%)、单身(42.5%)、天主教徒(48.4%)且有私人保险(55.3%)。在223名有怀孕风险的女性中(目前未怀孕,未使用任何非手术避孕方式(避孕套除外)且既往未行输卵管结扎或子宫切除术),约25%正在使用BCP,不到10%曾使用过EC,近40%从未使用过避孕套。大多数女性对BCP和避孕套有较好的了解,但对EC的了解较差。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,有怀孕风险的女性当前使用BCP与年龄较小[比值比(OR)=0.54;95%置信区间(CI)=0.37 - 0.79]、有私人保险(OR = 2.52;95% CI = 1.30 - 4.86)以及近期有性行为(OR = 1.61;95% CI = 1.19 - 2.18)相关。在有怀孕风险的女性中,有过堕胎经历的(OR = 2.56;95% CI = 1.17 - 5.61)以及对EC了解较多的(OR = 3.23;95% CI = 1.50 - 6.95)使用EC的几率更高。在所有女性中,更频繁使用避孕套与年龄较小(OR = 0.57;95% CI = 0.46 - 0.70)、从未结婚(OR = 0.44;95% CI = 0.28 - 0.68)以及近期无性行为(OR = 0.79;95% CI = 0.64 - 0.98)相关。

结论

高比例的女性急诊科患者(41.4%)有怀孕风险。人口统计学和性健康史因素有助于识别可能从避孕措施转诊或教育中受益的女性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验