Gold Melanie A, Wolford Jennifer E, Smith Kym A, Parker Andrew M
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Apr;17(2):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2003.11.018.
Advance provision of emergency contraception (EC) may increase timely access and improve effectiveness, but the impact on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviors is not known.
To determine whether adolescents given advance EC have higher sexual and contraceptive risk-taking behaviors compared to those obtaining it on an as-needed basis.
Randomized trial conducted at urban, hospital-based adolescent clinic in Pittsburgh, PA, from June 1997 to June 2002.
301 predominantly minority, low-income, sexually active adolescent women, age 15-20 years, not using long-acting contraception.
Advance EC vs instruction on how to get emergency contraception.
Self-reported unprotected intercourse and use of condoms, EC, and hormonal contraception ascertained by monthly 10-minute telephone interviews for 6 months post-enrollment. Reported timing of EC use after unprotected intercourse.
At both 1- and 6-month followup interviews, there were no differences between advance EC and control groups in reported unprotected intercourse within the past month or at last intercourse. At 6 months, more advance EC participants reported condom use in the past month compared to control group participants (77% vs 62%, P=0.02), but not at last intercourse (advance EC 83% vs control 78%, P=0.34). There were no significant differences by group in hormonal contraception use reported by advance EC or control groups in the past month (44% vs 53%, P=0.19) or at last intercourse (48% vs 58%, P=0.20). At the first followup, the advance group reported nearly twice as much EC use as the control group (15% vs 8%, P=0.05) but not at the final followup (8% vs 6%, P=0.54). Advance EC group participants began their EC significantly sooner (11.4 hours vs 21.8 hours, P=0.005).
Providing advance EC to adolescents is not associated with more unprotected intercourse or less condom or hormonal contraception use. In the first month after enrollment, adolescents provided with advance EC were nearly twice as likely to use it and began EC sooner, when it is known to be more effective.
提前提供紧急避孕(EC)可能会增加及时获取的机会并提高其有效性,但对青少年性和避孕行为的影响尚不清楚。
确定与按需获取紧急避孕的青少年相比,提前获得紧急避孕的青少年是否有更高的性和避孕冒险行为。
1997年6月至2002年6月在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市一家以医院为基础的城市青少年诊所进行的随机试验。
301名主要为少数族裔、低收入、有性行为的15 - 20岁青少年女性,未使用长效避孕方法。
提前提供紧急避孕与关于如何获取紧急避孕的指导。
通过入组后6个月每月10分钟的电话访谈确定自我报告的无保护性交以及避孕套、紧急避孕和激素避孕的使用情况。报告无保护性交后使用紧急避孕的时间。
在1个月和6个月的随访访谈中,提前提供紧急避孕组和对照组在过去一个月或最后一次性交时报告的无保护性交方面没有差异。在6个月时,与对照组参与者相比,提前提供紧急避孕组更多参与者报告在过去一个月使用了避孕套(77%对62%,P = 0.02),但在最后一次性交时没有差异(提前提供紧急避孕组83%对对照组78%,P = 0.34)。提前提供紧急避孕组和对照组在过去一个月(44%对53%,P = 0.19)或最后一次性交时(48%对58%,P = 0.20)报告的激素避孕使用情况在组间没有显著差异。在第一次随访时,提前提供紧急避孕组报告的紧急避孕使用量几乎是对照组的两倍(15%对8%,P = 0.05),但在最后一次随访时没有差异(8%对6%,P = 0.54)。提前提供紧急避孕组参与者开始使用紧急避孕的时间明显更早(11.4小时对21.8小时,P = 0.005)。
向青少年提前提供紧急避孕与更多的无保护性交或更少的避孕套或激素避孕使用无关。在入组后的第一个月,提前获得紧急避孕的青少年使用紧急避孕的可能性几乎是对照组的两倍,并且开始使用紧急避孕的时间更早,而此时已知紧急避孕更有效。