Suppr超能文献

测量口服避孕药知识:研究结果和局限性的回顾。

Measuring oral contraceptive knowledge: a review of research findings and limitations.

机构信息

Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Poor oral contraceptive (OC) knowledge may contribute to premature OC discontinuation and unintended pregnancy. Yet, to understand relationships between OC knowledge and contraceptive behavior, knowledge must be adequately measured. This review evaluates the findings and methodological limitations of research in which OC knowledge has been measured.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of primary research from January 1965 to January 2009. Studies were audited for study characteristics, purpose for measuring OC knowledge, key findings and measurement properties including administration method, knowledge domains, reliability, validity, health literacy and cultural sensitivity.

RESULTS

We reviewed 21 studies: 18 cohort studies, including one psychometric evaluation, and three randomized trials. Results on OC knowledge outcomes were variable. Measures were largely self-administered survey (n=15) and lacked assessment of all OC knowledge domains. Information on measures' characteristics, reliability, validity, health literacy and cultural sensitivity was limited.

CONCLUSION

Existing OC knowledge measures lack critical psychometric elements, leading to inconsistent and unreliable findings.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Poor OC knowledge measurement precludes identifying counseling needs and developing interventions for contraceptive behavior change. Future research considerations include: measurement information in publications, psychometric evaluations, formal reliability/validity techniques, and attention to all OC knowledge domains, health literacy and cultural sensitivity.

摘要

目的

口服避孕药(OC)知识不足可能导致提前停止使用 OC 和意外怀孕。然而,要了解 OC 知识与避孕行为之间的关系,就必须充分衡量 OC 知识。本综述评估了衡量 OC 知识的研究的结果和方法学局限性。

方法

我们对 1965 年 1 月至 2009 年 1 月的主要研究进行了系统回顾。对研究特征、衡量 OC 知识的目的、主要发现和测量特性(包括管理方法、知识领域、可靠性、有效性、健康素养和文化敏感性)进行了审核。

结果

我们回顾了 21 项研究:18 项队列研究,包括一项心理测量评估和三项随机试验。OC 知识结果差异较大。这些措施大多是自我管理的调查(n=15),并且缺乏对所有 OC 知识领域的评估。有关措施特点、可靠性、有效性、健康素养和文化敏感性的信息有限。

结论

现有的 OC 知识衡量方法缺乏关键的心理计量学要素,导致结果不一致且不可靠。

实践意义

OC 知识衡量不足,无法确定咨询需求和制定改变避孕行为的干预措施。未来的研究考虑因素包括:出版物中的测量信息、心理计量评估、正式的可靠性/有效性技术,以及对所有 OC 知识领域、健康素养和文化敏感性的关注。

相似文献

3
Hormonal contraceptives for contraception in overweight or obese women.超重或肥胖女性避孕用激素避孕药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD008452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008452.pub4.
6

引用本文的文献

7
The Health Belief Model can guide modern contraceptive behavior research and practice.健康信念模型可以指导现代避孕行为研究和实践。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00110.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

4
Adolescents: is there an association between knowledge of oral contraceptives and profession of provider?
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Dec;12(4):303-8. doi: 10.1080/13625180701475558.
10
Literacy and health outcomes.读写能力与健康结果。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004 Jan(87):1-8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验