Leong S C L, Karkos P D, Apostolidou M T
Department of Otolaryngology, Derby Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Nov;70(11):1841-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
To define the role of medical or surgical treatment in patients with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA syndrome).
A Medline search was performed using the terms PFAPA, periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, cervical adenitis, treatment. A systematic review of the English literature was performed. Papers on pyrexia of unknown origin in the pediatric population were excluded; this was because the clinical entities included in the differential diagnosis of pyrexia of unknown origin share many clinical characteristics with PFAPA, and may be ill defined.
Twenty-seven papers have been published since 1989, of which 20 were in English language. There were five single case reports and two papers involving two patients each. There were 6 retrospective reviews of case notes, involving 5-94 patients over a 3-10 year review period. Given that current evidence on the effectiveness of tonsillectomy in PFAPA is extremely weak (level of evidence V), tonsillectomy should not be performed.
PFAPA usually resolves without any long-term adverse effect, and as such, there is no role for tonsillectomy in these patients.
明确内科或外科治疗在周期性发热、阿弗他口炎、咽炎和颈淋巴结炎(PFAPA综合征)患者中的作用。
使用“PFAPA”“周期性发热”“阿弗他口炎”“咽炎”“颈淋巴结炎”“治疗”等检索词进行Medline检索。对英文文献进行系统综述。排除有关儿童不明原因发热的文献;这是因为不明原因发热鉴别诊断中所包含的临床病症与PFAPA有许多共同临床特征,且可能定义不明确。
自1989年以来已发表27篇论文,其中20篇为英文。有5篇单病例报告,2篇论文各涉及2例患者。有6篇病例记录回顾性研究,在3至10年的回顾期内涉及5至94例患者。鉴于目前关于扁桃体切除术治疗PFAPA有效性的证据极其薄弱(证据等级为V级),不应进行扁桃体切除术。
PFAPA通常可自行缓解且无任何长期不良影响,因此,扁桃体切除术对这些患者无效。