Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症治疗试验的特殊困难。

The peculiar difficulties of therapeutic trials for multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Myers L W, Ellison G W

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Reed Neurological Research Center, University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Neurol Clin. 1990 Feb;8(1):119-41.

PMID:1690838
Abstract

Because the immune response appears important in the pathogenesis of MS, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs and agents are used as a palliative treatment. Azathioprine alone is minimally efficacious and probably not worth the bother and risk. Cyclophosphamide alone is too toxic. Although cyclosporine A may slow the rate of deterioration in chronic progressive MS, adverse effects may limit its use outside major centers. Gamma interferon provokes exacerbations and should not be used. We do not recommend copolymer-1, alpha or beta interferon, monoclonal antibodies, plasmapheresis, and total lymphoid irradiation except in well-designed experimental protocols. Combination therapy of adrenal cortical steroids (ACS) with other immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine) merits further study. We think "pulse" synthetic ACS therapy has advantages over corticotropin and will become the "standard of care" for exacerbations. We also would try it for chronic progression. Even then, with the pulse treatment we still must determine the optimum dose, route, duration, and need for "taper."

摘要

由于免疫反应在多发性硬化症的发病机制中似乎很重要,因此抗炎和免疫调节药物被用作姑息治疗。单独使用硫唑嘌呤疗效甚微,可能不值得费心且有风险。单独使用环磷酰胺毒性太大。尽管环孢素A可能会减缓慢性进展型多发性硬化症的恶化速度,但不良反应可能会限制其在主要中心以外地区的使用。γ干扰素会引发病情加重,不应使用。除精心设计的实验方案外,我们不推荐使用共聚物-1、α或β干扰素、单克隆抗体、血浆置换和全淋巴照射。肾上腺皮质类固醇(ACS)与其他免疫抑制剂(环磷酰胺或环孢素)的联合治疗值得进一步研究。我们认为“冲击”合成ACS疗法比促肾上腺皮质激素更具优势,并将成为病情加重时的“标准治疗方法”。我们也会尝试将其用于慢性进展型疾病。即便如此,对于冲击治疗,我们仍必须确定最佳剂量、给药途径、持续时间以及“逐渐减量”的必要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Cytokine-induced autoimmune disorders.
Drug Saf. 1997 Aug;17(2):93-104. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199717020-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验