Hofmann Heike, Simmons Graham, Rennekamp Andrew J, Chaipan Chawaree, Gramberg Thomas, Heck Elke, Geier Martina, Wegele Anja, Marzi Andrea, Bates Paul, Pöhlmann Stefan
Institute for Clinical and Molecular Virology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
J Virol. 2006 Sep;80(17):8639-52. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00560-06.
We have recently demonstrated that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) also mediates cellular entry of the newly discovered human coronavirus (hCoV) NL63. Here, we show that expression of DC-SIGN augments NL63 spike (S)-protein-driven infection of susceptible cells, while only expression of ACE2 but not DC-SIGN is sufficient for entry into nonpermissive cells, indicating that ACE2 fulfills the criteria of a bona fide hCoV-NL63 receptor. As for SARS-CoV, murine ACE2 is used less efficiently by NL63-S for entry than human ACE2. In contrast, several amino acid exchanges in human ACE2 which diminish SARS-S-driven entry do not interfere with NL63-S-mediated infection, suggesting that SARS-S and NL63-S might engage human ACE2 differentially. Moreover, we observed that NL63-S-driven entry was less dependent on a low-pH environment and activity of endosomal proteases compared to infection mediated by SARS-S, further suggesting differences in hCoV-NL63 and SARS-CoV cellular entry. NL63-S does not exhibit significant homology to SARS-S but is highly related to the S-protein of hCoV-229E, which enters target cells by engaging CD13. Employing mutagenic analyses, we found that the N-terminal unique domain in NL63-S, which is absent in 229E-S, does not confer binding to ACE2. In contrast, the highly homologous C-terminal parts of the NL63-S1 and 229E-S1 subunits in conjunction with distinct amino acids in the central regions of these proteins confer recognition of ACE2 and CD13, respectively. Therefore, despite the high homology of these sequences, they likely form sufficiently distinct surfaces, thus determining receptor specificity.
我们最近证实,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)的受体血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)也介导新发现的人类冠状病毒(hCoV)NL63进入细胞。在此,我们表明,DC-SIGN的表达增强了NL63刺突(S)蛋白驱动的对易感细胞的感染,而对于非允许细胞的进入,只有ACE2的表达而非DC-SIGN的表达就足够了,这表明ACE2符合真正的hCoV-NL63受体的标准。与SARS-CoV一样,NL63-S利用鼠类ACE2进入细胞的效率低于人类ACE2。相反,人类ACE2中一些减少SARS-S驱动的进入的氨基酸交换并不干扰NL63-S介导的感染,这表明SARS-S和NL63-S与人类ACE2的相互作用可能存在差异。此外,我们观察到,与SARS-S介导的感染相比,NL63-S驱动的进入对低pH环境和内体蛋白酶活性的依赖性较小,这进一步表明hCoV-NL63和SARS-CoV进入细胞存在差异。NL63-S与SARS-S没有显著的同源性,但与通过结合CD13进入靶细胞的hCoV-229E的S蛋白高度相关。通过诱变分析,我们发现NL63-S中229E-S所没有的N端独特结构域并不赋予其与ACE2的结合能力。相反,NL63-S1和229E-S1亚基高度同源的C端部分,与这些蛋白中心区域的不同氨基酸一起,分别赋予对ACE2和CD13的识别能力。因此,尽管这些序列具有高度同源性,但它们可能形成足够不同的表面,从而决定受体特异性。