Ashford Lori S, Smith Rhonda R, De Souza Roger-Mark, Fikree Fariyal F, Yinger Nancy V
Population Reference Bureau, NW, Washington, DC 20009, USA.
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):669-72. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.030593.
Because researchers and policy-makers work in different spheres, policy decisions in the health arena are often not based on available scientific evidence.
We describe a model that illustrates the policy process and how to work strategically to translate knowledge into policy actions. Several types of activity--agenda-setting, coalition building and policy learning--together can create a window of opportunity for policy change.
Activities were undertaken as part of the Kenyan Ministry of Health's new decentralized planning-process. The objective was to ensure that the results of a national assessment of health services were used in the preparation of district-level health plans.
Following the intervention, 70 district-level, evidence-based work plans were developed and approved by the Kenyan Ministry of Health.
Substantial investment and effort are needed to bring stakeholders together to work towards policy change. More in-depth evaluation of these efforts can aid understanding of how systematic approaches to policy change can be replicated elsewhere.
由于研究人员和政策制定者在不同领域工作,卫生领域的政策决策往往并非基于现有的科学证据。
我们描述了一个模型,该模型阐释了政策过程以及如何战略性地开展工作,将知识转化为政策行动。议程设定、联盟建设和政策学习等几种活动共同作用,可以为政策变革创造一个机会之窗。
这些活动是作为肯尼亚卫生部新的分权规划过程的一部分开展的。目的是确保在制定地区级卫生计划时利用全国卫生服务评估的结果。
干预措施实施后,肯尼亚卫生部制定并批准了70份基于证据的地区级工作计划。
需要大量投资和努力才能使利益相关者共同努力推动政策变革。对这些努力进行更深入的评估有助于理解如何在其他地方复制系统性的政策变革方法。