• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识转化中的语境是什么?系统范围综述的结果。

What is context in knowledge translation? Results of a systematic scoping review.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute - CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 29;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01143-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01143-5
PMID:38685073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11057149/
Abstract

Knowledge Translation (KT) aims to convey novel ideas to relevant stakeholders, motivating their response or action to improve people's health. Initially, the KT literature focused on evidence-based medicine, applying findings from laboratory and clinical research to disease diagnosis and treatment. Since the early 2000s, the scope of KT has expanded to include decision-making with health policy implications.This systematic scoping review aims to assess the evolving knowledge-to-policy concepts, that is, macro-level KT theories, models and frameworks (KT TMFs). While significant attention has been devoted to transferring knowledge to healthcare settings (i.e. implementing health policies, programmes or measures at the meso-level), the definition of 'context' in the realm of health policymaking at the macro-level remains underexplored in the KT literature. This study aims to close the gap.A total of 32 macro-level KT TMFs were identified, with only a limited subset of them offering detailed insights into contextual factors that matter in health policymaking. Notably, the majority of these studies prompt policy changes in low- and middle-income countries and received support from international organisations, the European Union, development agencies or philanthropic entities.

摘要

知识转化(KT)旨在向相关利益攸关方传达新的想法,激发他们的反应或行动,以改善人们的健康。最初,KT 文献侧重于循证医学,将实验室和临床研究的发现应用于疾病的诊断和治疗。自 21 世纪初以来,KT 的范围已经扩大到包括具有健康政策影响的决策。本系统范围审查旨在评估不断发展的知识到政策概念,即宏观层面的 KT 理论、模型和框架(KT TMFs)。虽然已经非常关注将知识转移到医疗保健环境中(即在中观层面实施卫生政策、方案或措施),但在 KT 文献中,健康决策制定宏观层面的“背景”定义仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在弥补这一空白。共确定了 32 个宏观层面的 KT TMF,其中只有有限的一部分详细探讨了对健康决策有重要影响的背景因素。值得注意的是,这些研究中的大多数都促使中低收入国家发生政策变化,并且得到了国际组织、欧盟、发展机构或慈善实体的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b5d/11057149/b2658b653f24/12961_2024_1143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b5d/11057149/b2658b653f24/12961_2024_1143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b5d/11057149/b2658b653f24/12961_2024_1143_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What is context in knowledge translation? Results of a systematic scoping review.知识转化中的语境是什么?系统范围综述的结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 29;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01143-5.
2
A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks.全范围知识转化理论、模型和框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2020 Feb 14;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0964-5.
3
Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems.非洲卫生系统中知识转化策略、结果、促进因素和障碍的证据图谱。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0.
4
National strategies for knowledge translation in health policy-making: A scoping review of grey literature.国家卫生决策知识转化战略:灰色文献的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 20;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01089-0.
5
Protocol of a scoping review on knowledge translation competencies.知识转化能力范围综述研究方案
Syst Rev. 2017 May 2;6(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0481-z.
6
A systematic review of frameworks for the interrelationships of mental health evidence and policy in low- and middle-income countries.系统评价框架对中低收入国家心理健康证据与政策的相互关系。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 22;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0357-2.
7
Supporting researchers in knowledge translation and dissemination of their research to increase usability and impact.支持研究人员进行知识转化,并将其研究成果传播出去,以提高可用性和影响力。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):2959-2968. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03122-1. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Improving knowledge translation in Uganda: more needs to be done.在乌干达改善知识转化:仍有更多工作要做。
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3482. eCollection 2014.
9
Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries.将研究证据纳入决策过程:来自五个低收入和中等收入国家的研究者与决策者的看法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 30;13:70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0059-y.
10
Enhancing evidence informed policymaking in complex health systems: lessons from multi-site collaborative approaches.加强复杂卫生系统中的循证决策:多地点协作方法的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 17;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0089-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of knowledge translation in strengthening health policy and practice: sources, platforms, tools, opportunities, and challenges.关于加强卫生政策与实践中知识转化的范围综述:来源、平台、工具、机遇与挑战
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 25;83(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01567-7.
2
Enhancing the role of mass media in the translation of evidence from health policy and systems research in Nigeria.加强大众媒体在尼日利亚卫生政策与系统研究证据翻译中的作用。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 30;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01267-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework for evidence to policy networks.证据到政策网络的综合监测和评估框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Apr;91:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102053. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
A guide to systems-level, participatory, theory-informed implementation research in global health.全球健康系统级、参与式、理论导向实施研究指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005365.
3
EVITA 2.0, an updated framework for understanding evidence-based mental health policy agenda-setting: tested and informed by key informant interviews in a multilevel comparative case study.
EVITA 2.0,一个更新的理解循证心理健康政策制定的框架:通过多层次比较案例研究中的关键知情人访谈进行测试和提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 10;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00651-4.
4
Mapping the Qualitative Evidence Base on the Use of Research Evidence in Health Policy-Making: A Systematic Review.绘制研究证据在卫生决策中应用的定性证据基础图谱:系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):883-898. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.201. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
5
Rugged landscapes: complexity and implementation science.崎岖的地形:复杂性与实施科学。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01028-5.
6
What Constitutes Translational Research? Implications for the Scope of .什么构成转化研究?对……范围的影响
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 14;9(8):22. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.22. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Public health and political science: challenges and opportunities for a productive partnership.公共卫生与政治科学:富有成效的伙伴关系面临的挑战与机遇。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.定义和评估医疗保健实施研究中的背景:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based health innovations in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic literature review.低收入和中等收入国家实施循证健康创新的障碍与促进因素:一项系统文献综述
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Oct;82:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101832. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Health system decision-makers at the helm of implementation research: development of a framework to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of embedded approaches.卫生系统决策者主导实施研究:评估嵌入式方法的过程和效果的框架的制定。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00579-9.