Clevert D-A, Johnson T, Michaely H, Jung E M, Flach P M, Strautz T I, Clevert D-A, Reiser M, Schoenberg S O
Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich-Grosshadern Campus, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Dec;60(3):379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
The objective of this study was to determine the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with integrated parallel acquisition techniques (iPAT), color coded duplex ultrasound (CCDS) and power Doppler ultrasound (PD) in the assessment of high-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA).
Forty-four patients with 52 known or suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery (ICA) were included in this prospective study. High-resolution MRA scans with a spatial resolution of 0.9 mm x 0.7 mm x 0.9 mm were acquired with an iPAT acceleration factor of 2 on a 1.5T MR system (Sonata Maestro Class, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) with a head, neck and body coil. For the 3D-CE MRA a fast spoiled gradient echo sequence (FLASH) was used. To compensate for the inherent signal loss with parallel imaging, a 1M contrast agent (gadobutrol, Gadovist, Schering, Berlin, Germany) was used. Stenoses were quantified by two readers in consensus in cross-sectional area measurements and graded according to the NASCET criteria. Using color coded duplex ultrasound (CCDS) and power Doppler (PD; Logiq 9, GE), the stenoses were also graded by two readers in consensus according to the NASCET criteria from intra- and post-stenotic diameter measurements. The results of MRA, CCDS and PD were compared to intraoperative findings or to follow-up examinations.
High-resolution MRA allowed an excellent grading of vascular stenoses. In 70-90% degrees of stenosis there was an underestimation of the degree of stenosis in MRA as well as in CCDS. However, there was an overestimation of 90% stenoses in both MRA and CCDS. Pseudoocclusions with a lumen of less than one millimeter were occasionally rated as a complete occlusion in MRA.
A combination of MRA and duplex sonography seems reasonable for the accurate grading of stenoses and determination of distal stenoses downstream. However, the accuracy of duplex ultrasound depends on the examiner's experience.
本研究的目的是确定采用集成并行采集技术(iPAT)的高分辨率对比增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)、彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)和功率多普勒超声(PD)在评估颈内动脉(ICA)重度狭窄时的一致性和诊断准确性。
本前瞻性研究纳入了44例患者,其颈内动脉(ICA)存在52处已知或疑似狭窄。在配备头部、颈部和体部线圈的1.5T磁共振系统(Sonata Maestro Class,西门子医疗解决方案公司,德国埃尔朗根)上,采用iPAT加速因子为2的情况下,获取空间分辨率为0.9 mm×0.7 mm×0.9 mm的高分辨率MRA扫描图像。对于三维对比增强MRA,使用快速扰相梯度回波序列(FLASH)。为补偿并行成像时固有的信号损失,使用了1M的造影剂(钆布醇,加朵唯,先灵公司,德国柏林)。由两位阅片者共同对狭窄处的横截面积进行测量并量化,并根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)标准进行分级。使用彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)和功率多普勒(PD;Logiq 9,通用电气公司),两位阅片者也根据NASCET标准,通过测量狭窄处及其后方的内径,共同对狭窄进行分级。将MRA、CCDS和PD的结果与术中发现或随访检查结果进行比较。
高分辨率MRA能够对血管狭窄进行出色的分级。在70% - 90%的狭窄程度中,MRA和CCDS对狭窄程度均存在低估。然而,在MRA和CCDS中,对90%的狭窄均存在高估。在MRA中,管腔小于1毫米的假性闭塞偶尔会被判定为完全闭塞。
MRA和双功超声联合应用对于准确分级狭窄以及确定下游远端狭窄似乎是合理的。然而,双功超声的准确性取决于检查者的经验。