Pfister K, Rennert J, Greiner B, Jung W, Stehr A, Gössmann H, Menzel C, Zorger N, Prantl L, Feuerbach S, Kasprzak P, Jung E M
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;41(2):103-16. doi: 10.3233/CH-2009-1161.
Pre-surgical evaluation of the extent of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA) according to NASCT criteria using digital 3D ultrasound methods.
MATERIAL/METHODS: In a prospective study, 25 patients (54-88 years, mean 75) with neurological deficits and the diagnosis of ICA stenosis underwent pre-surgical ultrasound examination using Color Coded Duplex Sonography (CCDS), 3D CCDS, 3D power Doppler, 3D B-flow, contrast enhanced 3D B-flow, and CTA/MRA. Ultrasound was performed by an experienced examiner with a multifrequency linear transducer (6-9 MHz, Logiq 9, GE). After bolus injection of 2.4 ml Sonovue i.v., low mechanical index technique (MI<0.16) was used for contrast enhanced 3D B-flow. As reference method for evaluation of the extent of ICA stenosis each patient underwent CTA (multislice CT, Sensation 16, Siemens) and/or MRA (1.5 T, Symphony Siemens). Indications for surgery (carotid EEA) followed the NASCET criteria. All images were interpreted and evaluated independently by two observers with three measurements of the degree of the ICA stenosis. For assessment of the extent of stenosis a 10%-scale from 50% to 99% was used. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman Correlation and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with a significance threshold of p<0.05.
Assessment of the extent of ICA stenosis during surgery and in CTA/MRA displayed a range from 60% to 99% (mean 80%). Non significant differences were found with paired Wilcoxon test only for 3D B-flow with and without contrast medium (p<0.05). Correlation with surgical evaluation regarding the extent of ICA stenosis using Spearman correlation teat was 0.77 for B-scan, 0.90 for 3D CCDS, 0.84 for 3D Power Doppler, 0.91 for B-flow and 0.93 for contrast enhanced 3D B-flow. When circular calcifications were present, contrast enhanced flow detection of 3D B-flow proved to be useful. Visualisation of intrastenotic variances of severe and profound stenosis (70-99%) without blooming and reverberation artefacts was possible only with 3D B-flow. This facilitates the detection of the morphology of plaques ulcers as an embolic source.
In correlation with surgery and CTA/MRA, a valid evaluation of the extent and morphology of ICA stenosis using 3D B-flow, with and without contrast medium, is feasible.
采用数字三维超声方法,依据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准对颈内动脉狭窄(ICA)程度进行术前评估。
材料/方法:在一项前瞻性研究中,25例(年龄54 - 88岁,平均75岁)有神经功能缺损且诊断为ICA狭窄的患者接受了术前超声检查,检查方法包括彩色编码双功超声(CCDS)、三维CCDS、三维能量多普勒、三维B-flow、对比增强三维B-flow以及CT血管造影(CTA)/磁共振血管造影(MRA)。超声检查由一位经验丰富的检查者使用多频率线性探头(6 - 9MHz,GE公司的Logiq 9)进行。经静脉团注2.4ml声诺维后,采用低机械指数技术(MI<0.16)进行对比增强三维B-flow检查。作为评估ICA狭窄程度的参考方法,每位患者均接受了CTA(多层螺旋CT,西门子Sensation 16)和/或MRA(1.5T,西门子Symphony)检查。手术适应证(颈动脉内膜切除术)遵循NASCET标准。所有图像由两名观察者独立解读和评估,对ICA狭窄程度进行三次测量。评估狭窄程度时采用了从50%到99%的10%分级标准。使用Spearman相关性分析和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析,显著性阈值为p<0.05。
手术中及CTA/MRA评估的ICA狭窄程度范围为60%至99%(平均80%)。配对Wilcoxon检验仅发现三维B-flow在使用和未使用造影剂时存在非显著性差异(p<0.05)。使用Spearman相关性检验,B超与手术评估的ICA狭窄程度相关性为0.77,三维CCDS为0.90,三维能量多普勒为0.84,B-flow为0.91,对比增强三维B-flow为0.93。当存在环形钙化时,对比增强三维B-flow的血流检测被证明是有用的。仅三维B-flow能够在不出现伪像增强和混响伪像的情况下可视化严重和极重度狭窄(70 - 99%)的狭窄内变化。这有助于检测作为栓子来源的斑块溃疡的形态。
与手术及CTA/MRA结果相关,使用三维B-flow(有无造影剂)对ICA狭窄程度和形态进行有效评估是可行的。