O'Donnell C P F, Gibson A T, Davis P G
Royal Women's Hospital Melbourne, 132 Grattan Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Sep;91(5):F369-73. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.089029.
Since ancient times many different methods have been used to revive newborns. Although subject to the vagaries of fashion for 2000 years, artificial respiration has been accepted as the mainstay of neonatal resuscitation for about the last 40. Formal teaching programmes have evolved over the last 20 years. The last 10 years have seen international collaboration, which has resulted in careful evaluation of the available evidence and publication of recommendations for clinical practice. There is, however, little evidence to support current recommendations, which are largely based on expert opinion. The challenge for neonatologists today is to gather robust evidence to support or refute these recommendations, thereby refining this common and important intervention.
自古以来,人们使用了许多不同的方法来复苏新生儿。尽管在2000年里受到时尚潮流的影响,但在过去约40年中,人工呼吸已被公认为新生儿复苏的主要手段。在过去20年里,正式的教学项目不断发展。在过去10年中,出现了国际合作,这使得人们对现有证据进行了仔细评估,并发布了临床实践建议。然而,几乎没有证据支持目前的建议,这些建议很大程度上基于专家意见。当今新生儿科医生面临的挑战是收集有力证据,以支持或反驳这些建议,从而完善这一常见且重要的干预措施。