Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚和乌干达不同奈韦拉平给药策略在预防母婴传播(PMTCT)项目中的效果。

Outcome of different nevirapine administration strategies in preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs in Tanzania and Uganda.

作者信息

Karcher Heiko, Kunz Andrea, Poggensee Gabriele, Mbezi Paulina, Mugenyi Kizito, Harms Gundel

机构信息

GTZ PMTCT Project, Institute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charite-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

MedGenMed. 2006 Apr 12;8(2):12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prevention-of-mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) interventions based on single-dose nevirapine (NVP) are widely implemented in Africa, but strategies differ regarding how and when to administer the drug to women and infants. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of different strategies with regard to NVP intake in pregnant women and their infants in Tanzania and Uganda.

METHODS

In an observational study carried out between March 2002 and December 2004, we compared a directly observed NVP administration strategy in Tanzania (supervised NVP intake for women and infants at a health unit) and a semi-observed administration strategy (self-administered NVP for women at home and supervised intake for infants at a health unit) in Uganda.

RESULTS

The proportions of HIV-positive women accepting receipt of NVP from the health units were similar in the 2 countries (42.4% in Tanzania vs 45.6% in Uganda; P = .06). NVP intake in infants was significantly higher in Tanzania than in Uganda (43.7% vs 24.1%; P > .001). In a multivariate analysis, maternal age above 25 years, secondary education, Catholic faith, and having undergone PMTCT counseling at a hospital were independently associated with infant NVP intake.

CONCLUSION

In our settings, the directly observed administration strategy resulted in a higher NVP intake in infants. The semi-observed strategy, which implies that, after home delivery, the infant has to be presented to a health unit for NVP administration, was less successful.

摘要

目的

基于单剂量奈韦拉平(NVP)的预防母婴传播(PMTCT)干预措施在非洲广泛实施,但在如何以及何时向妇女和婴儿给药方面策略有所不同。本研究的目的是分析坦桑尼亚和乌干达在孕妇及其婴儿中使用NVP的不同策略的结果。

方法

在2002年3月至2004年12月进行的一项观察性研究中,我们比较了坦桑尼亚直接观察到的NVP给药策略(在卫生单位对妇女和婴儿进行监督下的NVP摄入)和乌干达的半观察给药策略(妇女在家自行服用NVP,婴儿在卫生单位接受监督摄入)。

结果

两个国家中接受卫生单位提供的NVP的HIV阳性妇女比例相似(坦桑尼亚为42.4%,乌干达为45.6%;P = 0.06)。坦桑尼亚婴儿的NVP摄入量显著高于乌干达(43.7%对24.1%;P > 0.001)。在多变量分析中,25岁以上的产妇年龄、中等教育程度、天主教信仰以及在医院接受过PMTCT咨询与婴儿NVP摄入量独立相关。

结论

在我们的研究环境中,直接观察到的给药策略导致婴儿的NVP摄入量更高。半观察策略意味着在家分娩后,婴儿必须到卫生单位接受NVP给药,效果较差。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验