Cole Donald C, Van Eerd Dwayne, Bigelow Philip, Rivilis Irina
Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E9, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Sep;16(3):359-74. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9032-5.
When applied to workplace interventions, integrative may be seen in various ways, requiring elucidation.
Identification of primary studies through systematic reviews, limited bibliographic literature searches, the Cochrane Occupational Health Field database on intervention studies, and authors' files. Focus was 2000 on. Categorization according to the Cochrane classes and lenses on integrative. Synthesis as narrative review.
Examples of each lens on integrative were uncovered: biomechanical and psychosocial, multiple component, primary and secondary prevention, organizational, and system. Each contributed different understanding to the potential impacts on different knowledge, exposure, behavior, health and administrative outcomes.
Considerable opportunities exist to expand the range of integrative interventions, particularly at the organizational and system levels, and incorporate a combination of knowledge transfer and exchange with intervention evaluation.
当应用于工作场所干预时，整合可能有多种理解方式，需要加以阐释。
通过系统评价、有限的文献检索、Cochrane职业健康领域干预研究数据库以及作者文件来识别原始研究。重点关注2000年以来的研究。根据Cochrane分类和整合视角进行分类。以叙述性综述的形式进行综合分析。
发现了整合的每种视角的实例：生物力学和社会心理、多成分、一级和二级预防、组织和系统。每种视角对不同的知识、暴露、行为、健康和管理结果的潜在影响都有不同的理解。
存在大量机会来扩大整合干预的范围，特别是在组织和系统层面，并将知识转移与交流和干预评估结合起来。
