Verbeek Jos, Husman Kaj, van Dijk Frank, Jauhiainen Merja, Pasternack Iris, Vainio Harri
Kuopio Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Department of Research and Development in Occupational Health, Finland.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004 Apr;30(2):164-70.
This article summarizes arguments for building an evidence base for occupational health. Evidence is needed on the most effective ways of eliminating health hazards in the workplace and at work, enhancing healthy behavior or the empowerment of workers, and preventing and treating occupational diseases and occupational disability. An evidence base for occupational health must include systematic reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration has brought together some of the evidence; however, a search for systematic reviews on the top priorities in occupational health research showed that systematic reviews are lacking in many areas. Current reviewing methods can be adapted to the special features of occupational health. It is concluded that more effort should be invested in the preparation, maintenance, and dissemination of systematic reviews in order to create a necessary evidence base for occupational health interventions. Occupational health could benefit considerably from greater awareness of the evidence for and against various types of intervention.
本文总结了建立职业健康证据基础的相关论点。需要有证据来证明消除工作场所和工作中健康危害、促进健康行为或增强工人权能以及预防和治疗职业病与职业残疾的最有效方法。职业健康的证据基础必须包括系统评价。Cochrane协作网已经汇集了一些证据;然而,对职业健康研究首要优先事项的系统评价检索表明,许多领域都缺乏系统评价。当前的评价方法可以根据职业健康的特点进行调整。得出的结论是,应投入更多努力来准备、维护和传播系统评价,以便为职业健康干预建立必要的证据基础。职业健康可以从对支持和反对各类干预措施的证据有更高认识中获益匪浅。