Rabe Klaus F, Atienza Tito, Magyar Pál, Larsson Per, Jorup Carin, Lalloo Umesh G
Department of Pulmonology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lancet. 2006 Aug 26;368(9537):744-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69284-2.
The contributions of as-needed inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) to asthma control have not been fully established. We compared the efficacy and safety of three reliever strategies: a traditional short-acting beta2 agonist; a rapid-onset LABA (formoterol); and a combination of LABA and an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide-formoterol) in symptomatic patients receiving budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy.
We did a 12-month, double-blind, parallel-group study in 3394 patients (aged 12 years or older), in 289 centres in 20 countries, who were using inhaled corticosteroids at study entry and symptomatic on budesonide-formoterol (160 microg and 4.5 microg, respectively), one inhalation twice daily, during a 2-week run-in. After run-in, patients were randomly assigned budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy plus one of three alternative as-needed medications-terbutaline (0.4 mg), formoterol (4.5 microg), or budesonide-formoterol (160 microg and 4.5 microg). The primary outcome was time to first severe exacerbation, defined as an event resulting in hospitalisation, emergency room treatment, or both, or the need for oral steroids for 3 days or more.
Time to first severe exacerbation was longer with as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol (p=0.0048; log-rank test) and with as-needed formoterol versus terbutaline (p=0.0051). The rate of severe exacerbations was 37, 29, and 19 per 100 patients per year with as-needed terbutaline, formoterol, and budesonide-formoterol, respectively (rate ratios budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol 0.67 [95% CI 0.56-0.80; p<0.0001]; budesonide-formoterol versus terbutaline 0.52 [0.44-0.62; p<0.0001]; formoterol versus terbutaline 0.78 [0.67-0.91; p=0.0012]). Asthma control days increased to a similar extent in all treatment groups. As-needed formoterol did not significantly improve symptoms compared with as-needed terbutaline. All treatments were well tolerated.
Both monocomponents of budesonide-formoterol given as needed contribute to enhanced protection from severe exacerbations in patients receiving combination therapy for maintenance.
按需使用吸入性糖皮质激素和长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)对哮喘控制的作用尚未完全明确。我们比较了三种缓解策略的疗效和安全性:传统短效β2受体激动剂;速效LABA(福莫特罗);以及LABA与吸入性糖皮质激素(布地奈德-福莫特罗)联合用药,研究对象为接受布地奈德-福莫特罗维持治疗且有症状的患者。
我们在20个国家的289个中心对3394例患者(年龄12岁及以上)进行了一项为期12个月的双盲平行组研究,这些患者在研究开始时正在使用吸入性糖皮质激素,且在为期2周的导入期内使用布地奈德-福莫特罗(分别为160微克和4.5微克),每日两次,每次吸入1吸时出现症状。导入期后,患者被随机分配接受布地奈德-福莫特罗维持治疗加三种按需使用的替代药物之一——特布他林(0.4毫克)、福莫特罗(4.5微克)或布地奈德-福莫特罗(160微克和4.5微克)。主要结局是首次严重加重的时间,定义为导致住院、急诊治疗或两者兼有的事件,或需要口服类固醇3天或更长时间。
按需使用布地奈德-福莫特罗与福莫特罗相比,首次严重加重的时间更长(p=0.0048;对数秩检验),按需使用福莫特罗与特布他林相比也是如此(p=0.0051)。按需使用特布他林、福莫特罗和布地奈德-福莫特罗时,严重加重的发生率分别为每年每100例患者37例、29例和19例(布地奈德-福莫特罗与福莫特罗的发生率比为0.67[95%CI0.56-0.80;p<0.0001];布地奈德-福莫特罗与特布他林的发生率比为0.52[0.44-0.62;p<0.0001];福莫特罗与特布他林的发生率比为0.78[0.67-0.91;p=0.0012])。所有治疗组的哮喘控制天数增加程度相似。按需使用福莫特罗与按需使用特布他林相比,症状改善不显著。所有治疗耐受性良好。
按需给予的布地奈德-福莫特罗的两种单一成分均有助于增强接受联合维持治疗患者对严重加重的防护。