• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

已记录的糖尿病照护过程指标数量是否与心血管代谢危险因素水平、患者满意度或糖尿病照护的自评质量相关?糖尿病研究成果转化为行动(TRIAD)研究。

Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.

作者信息

Ackermann Ronald T, Thompson Theodore J, Selby Joseph V, Safford Monika M, Stevens Mark, Brown Arleen F, Narayan K M Venkat

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 250 University Blvd., Suite 122, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2108-13. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0633.

DOI:10.2337/dc06-0633
PMID:16936161
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Simple process-of-care indicators are commonly recommended to assess and compare quality of diabetes care across health plans. We sought to determine whether variation in the number of simple diabetes processes of care across provider groups is associated with variation in other quality indicators, including cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction with care, or patient-rated quality of care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used cross-sectional survey and chart audit data for 8,733 patients with diabetes who received care from 68 provider groups nested in 10 health plans that participated in the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study. Analyses using hierarchical regression models assessed associations of the mean number of seven simple process measures with each of the following: HbA(1c) (A1C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), HDL and LDL cholesterol levels, patient satisfaction with care, and patient-rated quality of care.

RESULTS

After adjusting for case-mix differences across groups and plans, an average of one additional documented process of care for each patient in a group or plan was associated with significantly lower mean LDL cholesterol levels (-4.51 mg/dl [95% CI 1.46-7.58]) but not with A1C, SBP, or HDL cholesterol levels. The number of care processes documented was associated with patient satisfaction measures and self-rated quality of diabetes care.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in the number of simple process-of-care indicators across provider groups or health plans is associated with differences in patient-centered measures of quality, but assessment of the quality of cardiometabolic risk factor control will require more advanced clinical performance indicators.

摘要

目的

通常推荐使用简单的医疗过程指标来评估和比较不同健康计划下的糖尿病护理质量。我们试图确定不同医疗服务提供组之间简单糖尿病护理过程数量的差异是否与其他质量指标的差异相关,这些指标包括心血管代谢危险因素水平、患者对护理的满意度或患者自评的护理质量。

研究设计与方法

我们使用了横断面调查和病历审核数据,这些数据来自8733名糖尿病患者,他们接受了参与“将糖尿病研究转化为行动”研究的10个健康计划中的68个医疗服务提供组的护理。使用分层回归模型进行的分析评估了七种简单过程指标的平均数量与以下各项之间的关联:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、收缩压(SBP)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平、患者对护理的满意度以及患者自评的护理质量。

结果

在对不同组和计划之间的病例组合差异进行调整后,一个组或计划中每位患者平均多记录一个护理过程与显著更低的平均低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平相关(-4.51mg/dl [95%CI 1.46 - 7.58]),但与糖化血红蛋白、收缩压或高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平无关。记录的护理过程数量与患者满意度指标和糖尿病护理的自评质量相关。

结论

不同医疗服务提供组或健康计划之间简单护理过程指标数量的差异与以患者为中心的质量指标差异相关,但评估心血管代谢危险因素控制的质量将需要更先进的临床绩效指标。

相似文献

1
Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.已记录的糖尿病照护过程指标数量是否与心血管代谢危险因素水平、患者满意度或糖尿病照护的自评质量相关?糖尿病研究成果转化为行动(TRIAD)研究。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2108-13. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0633.
2
Patient self-management program for diabetes: first-year clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes.糖尿病患者自我管理项目:第一年的临床、人文及经济成果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005 Mar-Apr;45(2):130-7. doi: 10.1331/1544345053623492.
3
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.糖尿病护理流程及中间结果的改善:美国,1988 - 2002年
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.
4
Physicians' participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study.医生的参与式决策与糖尿病护理过程及结果的质量:三联研究结果
Chronic Illn. 2009 Sep;5(3):165-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309339258. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
5
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
6
Patient characteristics correlated with quality indicator outcomes in diabetes care.患者特征与糖尿病护理质量指标结果相关。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Sep;60(578):655-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515368.
7
The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs.医疗护理质量与糖尿病疾病管理项目强度之间的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 18;145(2):107-16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00008.
8
Identifying risk factors for racial disparities in diabetes outcomes: the translating research into action for diabetes study.识别糖尿病结局种族差异的风险因素:糖尿病研究将研究转化为行动
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):700-6. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318192609d.
9
HEMOGLOBIN A1C, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND LDL-CHOLESTEROL CONTROL AMONG HISPANIC/LATINO ADULTS WITH DIABETES: RESULTS FROM THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY/STUDY OF LATINOS (HCHS/SOL).西班牙裔/拉丁裔糖尿病成年患者的糖化血红蛋白、血压及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇控制情况:来自西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)的结果
Endocr Pract. 2017 Oct;23(10):1232-1253. doi: 10.4158/EP171765.OR. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk.基于慢性病护理模式的共享医疗预约:一项应对心血管高风险糖尿病患者挑战的质量改进项目。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019158.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Respect and Collaborative Decision Making on Diabetes Care Factors Among Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age With Diabetes in the United States.尊重与共同决策在美国育龄非妊娠糖尿病女性糖尿病护理因素中的作用
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 19;11:23743735241309474. doi: 10.1177/23743735241309474. eCollection 2024.
2
Albuminuria screening in children with type 1 diabetes prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.1 型糖尿病患儿在 COVID-19 大流行前和期间的蛋白尿筛查。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Nov;92(5):1370-1373. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01971-7. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Importance of an alternative approach to measuring quality in a volume-to-value world: a case study of diabetes care.
在从量到值的环境中采用替代方法衡量质量的重要性:糖尿病护理案例研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Dec 10;6(2):e000216. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000216. eCollection 2017.
4
Older Adults Reporting More Diabetes Mellitus Care Have Greater 9-Year Survival.报告接受更多糖尿病护理的老年人有更高的9年生存率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Dec;63(12):2455-2462. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13839. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
Comparison of Perceived and Technical Healthcare Quality in Primary Health Facilities: Implications for a Sustainable National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana.初级卫生保健机构中感知到的与技术层面的医疗质量比较:对加纳可持续国家医疗保险计划的启示
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140109. eCollection 2015.
6
Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.采用基于注册的护理的支持性实践(SPARC):一项随机对照试验的方案
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0232-2.
7
No consistent association between processes-of-care and health-related quality of life among patients with diabetes: a missing link?在糖尿病患者中,护理流程与健康相关生活质量之间没有一致的关联:缺失的环节?
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Jan 10;3(1):e000042. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000042. eCollection 2015.
8
Guideline adherence and health outcomes in diabetes mellitus type 2 patients: a cross-sectional study.2型糖尿病患者的指南依从性与健康结局:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0669-z.
9
Quality of care of people with type 2 diabetes in eight European countries: findings from the Guideline Adherence to Enhance Care (GUIDANCE) study.8 个欧洲国家 2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量:遵循指南以加强护理(GUIDANCE)研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2628-38. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1759. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
10
Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.糖尿病护理技术质量与患者体验之间的关联。
Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):e136-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00729.x. Epub 2011 Nov 8.