Brindis Ralph G, Spertus John
Oakland Medical Center, 280 West MacArthur Boulevard, Oakland, CA 94611, USA.
Acad Med. 2006 Sep;81(9):802-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200609000-00007.
Academic medicine, often entrenched in biomedical and clinical research, has largely ignored the development and application of quality metrics to ensure the delivery of high-quality health care. Nevertheless, academic medicine has substantial opportunities to lead the charge in building a quality infrastructure with the goal of delivering high-quality and cost-efficient health care to all Americans. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have worked jointly to measure and improve the quality of cardiovascular care. This effort has led to the development of clinical practice guidelines, performance measures, data standards, national registries, and appropriateness criteria for cardiovascular care. Academic medicine should actively embrace and promote the type of quality metrics and criteria developed by ACC and AHA and apply this model across the entire academic medicine community. Academic medicine, with its many resources, could lead the way in the expanding field of quality science by supporting fundamental research in quality improvement, supporting academicians to improve quality at their own institutions, developing educational models for quality assessment and improvement, creating and implementing data registries, and serving as a conduit for developing the emerging science of quality assessment. In this and many other ways, academic medicine must offer the health care community leadership for improving our nation's health care quality with the same fervor presently exhibited for the advancement of basic science, the development of specialized and experimental therapy, and as centers for tertiary and quaternary patient care.
学术医学往往专注于生物医学和临床研究,很大程度上忽视了质量指标的开发与应用,而这些指标对于确保提供高质量的医疗保健至关重要。尽管如此,学术医学有大量机会带头构建质量基础设施,目标是为所有美国人提供高质量且具成本效益的医疗保健。美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(AHA)共同努力,以衡量和提高心血管护理的质量。这一努力促成了临床实践指南、绩效指标、数据标准、国家登记系统以及心血管护理适宜性标准的制定。学术医学应积极接受并推广ACC和AHA所制定的这类质量指标和标准,并将此模式应用于整个学术医学领域。凭借其丰富的资源,学术医学可以通过支持质量改进方面的基础研究、支持学者在其所在机构提高质量、开发质量评估与改进的教育模式、创建并实施数据登记系统以及充当发展新兴质量评估科学的渠道,在不断拓展的质量科学领域引领潮流。通过这种及许多其他方式,学术医学必须像目前在推进基础科学、开发专科和实验性疗法以及作为三级和四级患者护理中心方面所展现的热情一样,为医疗保健界提供领导力,以提高我国的医疗保健质量。