Frei A, Gerhard U, Rümmele W
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Basel.
Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985). 1990;141(2):123-38.
The present catamnestic study covers 100 petitioners, who either applied for the first time for a driving licence or for readmission to traffic after confiscation of their license by the police. 99 of them were former inpatients or still inpatients at the time of judgement. For all of them, the decision of the police depended upon our expertise. For the judgement we considered our psychiatric investigation, the clinical report and the police traffic record. Normally, our mode of admission was quite generous. The duration of catamnesis lasted at least two years. Our of the 100 petitioners, 88 were considered to be fit for driving; 67 unconditionally and 21 under the condition of regular survey or treatment. Subsequently seven of the petitioners showed a poor probation, i.e. their licenses were taken away by the police, one due to a severe and two due to minor accidents. Nobody was injured. In comparison to the experience of other authors about probation in traffic of former psychiatric inpatients, we think we can report a favourable result. A rather generous mode of admission to traffic seems to be justified in these patients.
本次随访研究涵盖了100名申请人，他们要么是首次申请驾驶执照，要么是在驾照被警方没收后申请恢复交通驾驶资格。其中99人在判决时曾是住院患者或仍为住院患者。对所有这些人而言，警方的决定取决于我们的专业意见。在判决时，我们参考了精神病学调查、临床报告以及警方交通记录。通常情况下，我们的准入模式较为宽松。随访期至少持续两年。在这100名申请人中，88人被认为适合驾驶；67人无条件适合，21人在定期检查或治疗的条件下适合。随后，7名申请人试用情况不佳，即他们的驾照被警方没收，其中1人是因为发生严重事故，2人是因为发生轻微事故。无人受伤。与其他作者关于 former psychiatric inpatients 恢复交通驾驶资格试用情况的经验相比，我们认为我们可以报告一个良好的结果。对这些患者而言，较为宽松的交通驾驶准入模式似乎是合理的。 （注：原文中“former inpatients”直译为“以前的住院患者”，这里结合语境意译为“曾是住院患者” ；“former psychiatric inpatients”直译为“以前的精神病住院患者”，这里结合语境意译为“曾是精神病住院患者” ，感觉“former”翻译为“曾是”在中文语境里更通顺自然些，但不太确定是否完全符合你的要求，如果有问题可随时指出。）
