Perruchet Pierre, Cleeremans Axel, Destrebecqz Arnaud
Laboratore d'Etude de L'apprentissage et du Developpement, Universite de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Sep;32(5):955-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.955.
After repeated associations between two events, E1 and E2, responses to E2 can be facilitated either because participants consciously expect E2 to occur after E1 or because E1 automatically activates the response to E2, or because of both. In this article, the authors report on 4 experiments designed to pit the influence of these 2 factors against each other. The authors found that the fastest responses to a target in a reaction time paradigm occurred when automatic activation was highest and conscious expectancy lowest. These results, when considered together with previous findings indicating that, under most conditions, the relation between expectancy and reaction times is in the opposite direction, are indicative of a reversed association-an interaction pattern that J. C. Dunn and K. Kirsner (1988) demonstrated to be the only one that unambiguously points to the involvement of independent processes.
在两个事件E1和E2之间经过反复关联后,对E2的反应可能会得到促进,这要么是因为参与者有意识地预期E2会在E1之后发生,要么是因为E1自动激活了对E2的反应,或者是两者皆有。在本文中,作者报告了4项实验,旨在使这两种因素的影响相互对立。作者发现,在反应时范式中,当自动激活程度最高且有意识预期最低时,对目标的反应速度最快。这些结果,与之前的研究结果(表明在大多数情况下,预期与反应时间之间的关系是相反的)放在一起考虑,表明存在一种反向关联——一种J.C.邓恩和K.基尔斯纳(1988年)证明是唯一明确指向独立过程参与的交互模式。