Getirana-Mota Márcio, Aidar Felipe J, Ribeiro Neto Frederico, Santos Taísa Pereira, Almeida-Neto Paulo Francisco de, Cabral Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinôco, Vieira-Souza Lucio Marques, D Garrido Nuno, Reis Victor M, Souza Raphael Fabricio
Graduate Program of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, Sao Cristovao, Brazil.
Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports - GPEPS, the Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil.
Sports Med Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;8:a22077922. doi: 10.1055/a-2207-7922. eCollection 2024.
Mean propulsive velocity (MPV) has been associated with neuromuscular fatigue; however, its suitability for strength training in Paralympic powerlifting (PP) remains uncertain. The objective of this work was to evaluate the MPV in two training methods (traditional-TRAD and eccentric-ECC). Eleven PP athletes were evaluated pre, during the intervention and post intervention at a load of 80% of the 1RM for TRAD and 110%-80% of 1 RM for ECC. The results demonstrated that there was no significant neuromuscular fatigue for the TRAD (5% performance loss), as well as no significant decline in MPV during the intervention. For the ECC, there is a significant reduction in MPV before and after training (12% loss of performance). A difference between TRAD and ECC after the intervention was also identified (0.87 m/s±0.22, 95% CI 0.72-1.02 vs. 0.72±0.20, 95% CI 0.59-0.86 p=0.042, F(3.30)=10.190, η2p=0.505 - very high effect). During the intervention for ECC, no significant decline in MPV was observed. The results of this study suggest that the mechanical indices of MPV do not seem to be effective indicators of neuromuscular fatigue in the sample studied or in the context of this specific training regime, being more indicated as a control of training volume.
平均推进速度(MPV)与神经肌肉疲劳有关;然而,其在残奥会举重(PP)力量训练中的适用性仍不确定。这项工作的目的是评估两种训练方法(传统训练 - TRAD和离心训练 - ECC)中的MPV。对11名PP运动员在干预前、干预期间和干预后进行评估,TRAD的负荷为1RM的80%,ECC的负荷为1RM的110% - 80%。结果表明,TRAD训练没有明显的神经肌肉疲劳(表现损失约5%),干预期间MPV也没有显著下降。对于ECC,训练前后MPV有显著降低(表现损失约12%)。干预后还发现TRAD和ECC之间存在差异(0.87 m/s±0.22,95%CI 0.72 - 1.02 vs. 0.72±0.20,95%CI 0.59 - 0.86,p = 0.042,F(3.30)=10.190,η2p = 0.505 - 非常高的效应)。在ECC干预期间,未观察到MPV有显著下降。本研究结果表明,在本研究样本或这种特定训练方案的背景下,MPV的力学指标似乎不是神经肌肉疲劳的有效指标,更适合作为训练量的控制指标。