Huang Zijing, Dai Jing, Chen Lunxin, Yang Liang, Gong Min, Li Duanying, Sun Jian
Digitalized Performance Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Martial arts College, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Sports Health. 2025 May-Jun;17(3):545-555. doi: 10.1177/19417381241262024. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Both autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise (APRE) and velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) utilize real-time monitoring of athlete physical performance to adjust training loads to provide appropriate training stimuli. However, the monitoring and adjustment approaches differ between both methods. This study aimed to compare the effects of APRE and VBRT on the muscle strength, power, and agility of college taekwondo athletes.
Eight weeks of APRE and VBRT will promote similar results to strength gains in regards maximal strength, but VBRT will be superior to APRE in explosive power and agility.
Clinical trial.
Level 3.
Thirty taekwondo athletes were divided randomly into 2 groups (VBRT/APRE), and all participants completed an 8-week APRE/VBRT intervention. Maximum strength, explosive power, and agility performance were assessed during the squat 1-repetition maximum (1RM), countermovement jump (CMJ), drop jump (DJ), kicking strength test (KST), taekwondo-specific agility test (TSAT), and hexagon test (HT).
Highly significant time effects ( < 0.01) were observed for squat 1RM, CMJ, and TSAT in both the APRE and VBRT groups. However, there were no significant group-by-time differences for any of the measured outcomes to intergroup ( > 0.05), but APRE had a small effect size (ES) over VBRT for CMJ (ES = 0.48, = 0.06), TSAT (ES = 0.26, = 0.02), and HT (ES = 0.42, = 0.05).
An 8-week autoregulatory APRE and VBRT can both effectively improve both the maximal strength, explosive power, and agility performance of taekwondo athletes, with APRE exhibiting potential advantages in improving CMJ, TSAT, and HT.
These results provide important insights into the selection of suitable resistance training programs by professional coaches, taking into account athlete needs, training efficiency, and safety considerations.
自动调节渐进性抗阻训练（APRE）和基于速度的抗阻训练（VBRT）均利用对运动员身体表现的实时监测来调整训练负荷，以提供适当的训练刺激。然而，两种方法的监测和调整方式有所不同。本研究旨在比较APRE和VBRT对高校跆拳道运动员肌肉力量、功率和敏捷性的影响。
为期八周的APRE和VBRT在最大力量方面对力量增长的促进效果相似，但VBRT在爆发力和敏捷性方面优于APRE。
临床试验。
3级。
30名跆拳道运动员被随机分为两组（VBRT/APRE），所有参与者均完成了为期8周的APRE/VBRT干预。在深蹲1次最大重复量（1RM）、反向纵跳（CMJ）、下落跳（DJ）、踢腿力量测试（KST）、特定于跆拳道的敏捷性测试（TSAT）和六边形测试（HT）期间，评估最大力量、爆发力和敏捷性表现。
APRE组和VBRT组在深蹲1RM、CMJ和TSAT方面均观察到高度显著的时间效应（<0.01）。然而，对于任何测量结果，组间随时间的差异均无统计学意义（>0.05），但在CMJ（效应量ES = 0.48，P = 0.06）、TSAT（ES = 0.26，P = 0.02）和HT（ES = 0.42，P = 0.05）方面，APRE相对于VBRT有较小的效应量。
为期8周的自动调节APRE和VBRT均可有效提高跆拳道运动员的最大力量、爆发力和敏捷性表现，APRE在改善CMJ、TSAT和HT方面具有潜在优势。
这些结果为专业教练选择合适的抗阻训练方案提供了重要见解，同时考虑了运动员需求、训练效率和安全因素。
