Suppr超能文献

上消化道内镜检查期间清醒镇静下的心肺功能不全

Cardiorespiratory compromise under conscious sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

作者信息

A Bahalla, A Sood, A Sachdeva, A Duseja, V Gupta

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Sep;16(9):585-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cardiorespiratory effects of benzodiazepine and midazolam used for sedation in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with cardiorespiratory changes in the non-sedated patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative, randomized, single blind study. Duration and Setting: Department of Medicine at Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India, from January to July 2000.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 252 adult patients without previous cardiorespiratory co-morbidity, undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were recruited. They were randomly allocated in to group I (placebo with saline administration), group II (diazepam administered) and group III (midazolam administered). The pulse rate, blood pressure, ECG and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) was noted at baseline, after pre-medication, during endoscopy and postendoscopy. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test, Chi-square test and ANOVA as applicable.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline record of the three groups. Significant fall in SpO2 was noted in all the groups, more marked in the sedated one during endoscopy. Tachycardia developed in all the three groups and settled within 5 minutes of endoscopy. Blood pressure remained more stable in the sedated group. ECG changes included atrial and ventricular premature contraction in all the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy is a safe procedure where cardiorespiratory complication are minimized in non-sedated patients when appropriately selected.

摘要

目的

比较苯二氮䓬类药物和咪达唑仑用于上消化道内镜检查患者镇静时的心肺效应,并与未镇静患者的心肺变化进行比较。

研究设计

比较性、随机、单盲研究。研究时间和地点:2000年1月至7月,印度昌迪加尔政府医学院附属医院内科。

患者和方法

共招募了252例无既往心肺合并症且接受上消化道内镜检查的成年患者。他们被随机分为I组(给予生理盐水安慰剂)、II组(给予地西泮)和III组(给予咪达唑仑)。在基线、术前用药后、内镜检查期间和内镜检查后记录脉搏率、血压、心电图和外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)。根据适用情况,采用配对t检验、卡方检验和方差分析进行统计分析。

结果

三组的基线记录无差异。所有组均观察到SpO2显著下降,在内镜检查期间,镇静组更为明显。三组均出现心动过速,并在内镜检查后5分钟内恢复正常。镇静组血压保持更稳定。心电图变化包括三组均出现房性和室性早搏。

结论

内镜检查是一种安全的操作,在适当选择的未镇静患者中,心肺并发症可降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验