Suppr超能文献

正在接受口服抗凝治疗的患者进行前列腺光选择性汽化术(PVP)的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation.

作者信息

Ruszat Robin, Wyler Stephen, Forster Thomas, Reich Oliver, Stief Christian G, Gasser Thomas C, Sulser Tullio, Bachmann Alexander

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2007 Apr;51(4):1031-8; discussion 1038-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Aug 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ongoing oral anticoagulation (OA) contraindicates transurethral electroresection of the prostate. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing OA with coumarin derivatives, aspirin, or clopidogrel, complaining of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

We evaluated perioperative parameters, functional outcome, and adverse events up to 24 mo postoperatively of patients on OA, and compared results with 92 men at normal risk without anticoagulant therapy undergoing PVP for the same indication (control).

RESULTS

Within 40 mo, 116 men on OA were included, with 31% (n=36) receiving coumarin derivatives; 61% (n=71), aspirin; and 8% (n=9), clopidogrel. Mean prostate volume (62+/-34ml vs. 57+/-25ml; p=0.289) and mean operation time (67+/-28min vs 63+/-29min; p=0.313) were comparable with control. We observed no bleeding complications necessitating blood transfusions. Average postoperative decrease of haemoglobin was 8.6% for patients on OA versus 8.8% for control. At 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo postoperatively, improvement of the International Prostate Symptom Score ranged from 60-70%; postvoid residual volume, 80-88%; and average maximum urinary flow rate, 116-140%, respectively. Postoperative complications were low and comparable with control.

CONCLUSIONS

PVP is characterized by excellent haemostatic properties and very low intraoperative complication rate even in patients on OA. On the basis of our perioperative results, we recommend PVP as first-line procedure for patients with symptomatic BPH at high risk of bleeding.

摘要

目的

正在进行口服抗凝治疗(OA)是经尿道前列腺电切术的禁忌证。我们评估了正在使用香豆素衍生物、阿司匹林或氯吡格雷进行口服抗凝治疗且患有症状性良性前列腺增生(BPH)的患者行前列腺光选择性汽化术(PVP)的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们评估了口服抗凝治疗患者的围手术期参数、功能结局以及术后24个月内的不良事件,并将结果与92名因相同适应证接受PVP且无抗凝治疗正常风险的男性(对照组)进行比较。

结果

在40个月内,纳入了116名口服抗凝治疗的男性,其中31%(n = 36)接受香豆素衍生物治疗;61%(n = 71)接受阿司匹林治疗;8%(n = 9)接受氯吡格雷治疗。平均前列腺体积(62±34ml对57±25ml;p = 0.289)和平均手术时间(67±28分钟对63±29分钟;p = 0.313)与对照组相当。我们未观察到需要输血的出血并发症。口服抗凝治疗患者术后血红蛋白平均下降8.6%,而对照组为8.8%。术后3、6、12和24个月时,国际前列腺症状评分的改善率分别为60 - 70%;残余尿量,80 - 88%;平均最大尿流率,116 - 140%。术后并发症发生率低且与对照组相当。

结论

PVP具有出色的止血特性,即使在口服抗凝治疗的患者中,术中并发症发生率也非常低。根据我们的围手术期结果,我们推荐PVP作为有出血高风险的症状性BPH患者的一线治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验