• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class v resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems.使用全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结系统时,金刚石车针切割效能对Ⅴ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Fall;7(4):218-25. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
2
Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.Er:YAG 激光与牙钻制备的乳牙窝洞微渗漏与不同粘接修复材料修复的比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1222-0. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
3
A Comparative Study of Cervical Composite Restorations Microleakage Using Dental Universal Bonding and Two-step Self-etch Adhesive.采用通用黏结剂和两步自酸蚀黏结剂对颈椎复合材料修复体微渗漏的对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Sep 1;22(9):1035-1040.
4
Evaluation of Microleakage with Total Etch, Self Etch and Universal Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations: An In vitro Study.第五类洞修复中全酸蚀、自酸蚀和通用粘结系统微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC53-ZC56. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24907.9680. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
5
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.采用两步酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统对有和无衬层的后牙复合树脂微渗漏的体外比较。
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
6
The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.牙合面负荷对Ⅴ类洞修复体微渗漏的影响。
Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):135-41. doi: 10.2341/07-49.
7
The effects of cavity-filling techniques on microleakage in class II resin restorations prepared with Er:YAG laser and diamond bur: A scanning electron microscopy study.铒钇铝石榴石激光与金刚砂车针制备Ⅱ类树脂修复体时充填技术对微渗漏的影响:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):389-395. doi: 10.1002/sca.21282. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
8
Assessment of Tooth Preparation via Er:YAG Laser and Bur on Microleakage of Dentin Adhesives.通过铒钇铝石榴石激光和车针进行牙体预备对牙本质黏结剂微渗漏的评估
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Mar;11(2):172-8. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study.钬激光与车针制备V类复合树脂修复体时全酸蚀、自酸蚀和选择性酸蚀技术的比较:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2016 Oct;79(10):998-1004. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22735. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
10
Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er:YAG Laser with Different Pulse Modes.不同脉冲模式的铒激光制备Ⅴ类洞时自酸蚀粘接系统的微渗漏
Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Sep;33(9):467-72. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3926. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a Universal Adhesive System and the Snow-Plow Technique on Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations in Primary Molars.通用粘结系统和雪犁技术对乳磨牙Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Front Dent. 2025 May 1;22:17. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i17.18688. eCollection 2025.
2
Nanoleakage of Class V Resin Restorations Using Two Nanofilled Adhesive Systems.使用两种纳米填充粘结系统的V类树脂修复体的微渗漏
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Jul;7(7):6-11.

本文引用的文献

1
Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite.基于硅氧烷的复合材料与基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合材料的微渗漏评估
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):152-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.71649.
2
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of fifth, sixth, and seventh generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study.第五、六、七代牙本质粘结剂微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):136-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.71645.
3
A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self etching primer in class V cavities: An in vitro study.使用自酸蚀底漆对三种不同新型直接复合树脂在Ⅴ类洞中的微渗漏进行比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2009 Oct;12(4):160-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.58340.
4
Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.使用一种全酸蚀和三种自酸蚀粘结剂修复界面微渗漏。
Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):179-84. doi: 10.2341/06-54.
5
Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods.与不同表面处理方法相关的树脂-牙本质粘结强度
J Dent. 2007 Jun;35(6):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.002. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
6
Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.高速硬质合金车针、铒激光和空气磨蚀制备的乳磨牙中可流动复合树脂修复体边缘微渗漏的比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2006 May-Aug;73(2):122-6.
7
Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.使用牙钻或空气磨蚀技术预备乳牙后复合树脂修复体的微渗漏情况。
Oper Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):164-9.
8
Effect of surface preparation on microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems to bovine enamel.
J Adhes Dent. 2004 Winter;6(4):279-85.
9
The effect of multiple uses of disposable diamond burs on restoration leakage.一次性使用金刚砂车针多次使用对修复体边缘微渗漏的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jan;136(1):53-7; quiz 90. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0026.
10
Effect of bur-cut dentin on bond strength using two all-in-one and one two-step adhesive systems.使用两种一步法和一种两步法粘结系统时,备洞型牙本质对粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2004 Summer;6(2):97-104.

使用全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结系统时,金刚石车针切割效能对Ⅴ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。

The effect of cutting efficacy of diamond burs on microleakage of class v resin composite restorations using total etch and self etch adhesive systems.

作者信息

Malekipour M R, Shirani F, Tahmourespour S

机构信息

Assistant Professor of Operative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Azad University, Isfahan(Khorasgan Branch), Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Fall;7(4):218-25. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

PMID:21998798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3184760/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the effect of bur cutting efficacy was evaluated on microleakage of class V composite restorations with two adhesive systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Class V cavities were produced on sound extracted human teeth, which had been assigned randomly to one of six groups (N=15) as follows: Groups 1 and 6 were prepared using used rough diamond bur; Group 2 and 5 were prepared using new rough diamond bur; Group 3 and 4 were prepared using soft diamond bur. After application of Single Bond (3M Dental Product, USA) in groups 4,5 and 6 and Clearfil SE Bond [Kurary Medical Inc. Japan] in groups 1,2 and 3, all cavities were restored with composite resin. The teeth were thermocycled and microleakage was evaluated by dye penetration. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni's correction were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed that gingival margins significantly leaked more than occlusal margins for all bur types and bonding systems. Using the same adhesive system in gingival margins, significant difference was seen between bur types and using the same bur type in occlusal margins, there was a significant difference between the two types of adhesive systems.

CONCLUSION

Cutting efficiency of bur had a great effect on microleakage of resin composite restorations. So long term use of burs may result in an increase in microleakage of composite resin restorations.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,评估了两种粘结系统下车针切割效能对Ⅴ类复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。

材料与方法

在完好拔除的人牙上制备Ⅴ类洞,随机分为6组(每组n = 15),分组如下:第1组和第6组使用用过的粗金刚砂车针制备;第2组和第5组使用新的粗金刚砂车针制备;第3组和第4组使用软质金刚砂车针制备。在第4、5和6组应用单键粘结剂(美国3M牙科产品公司),在第1、2和3组应用Clearfil SE Bond粘结剂(日本可乐丽医疗株式会社)后,所有窝洞均用复合树脂修复。对牙齿进行热循环处理,并通过染料渗透评估微渗漏情况。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和经Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。

结果

结果显示,对于所有车针类型和粘结系统,牙龈边缘的微渗漏明显多于咬合边缘。在牙龈边缘使用相同的粘结系统时,车针类型之间存在显著差异;在咬合边缘使用相同的车针类型时,两种粘结系统之间存在显著差异。

结论

车针的切割效率对树脂复合修复体的微渗漏有很大影响。车针的长期使用可能会导致复合树脂修复体微渗漏增加。