Suppr超能文献

高催眠易感性者更生动的意象是否依赖于更大的认知努力?一项关于催眠的解离理论和社会认知理论的测试。

Does the more vivid imagery of high hypnotizables depend on greater cognitive effort? A test of dissociation and social-cognitive theories of hypnosis.

作者信息

Sadler Pamela, Woody Erik Z

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2006 Oct;54(4):372-91. doi: 10.1080/00207140600856715.

Abstract

In an investigation of the role of cognitive effort in hypnotic responding, high and low hypnotizable participants produced emotionally neutral imagery in response to effortful versus effortless hypnotic suggestions. Heart-rate increase served as an objective index of cognitive effort, and subjective ratings of imagery vividness, absorption, effort, and control were collected. Compared to lows, high hypnotizable participants experienced their imagery as more vivid and absorbing, yet their heart rates indicated no higher level of cognitive effort than lows. Compared to effortless wording, effortful wording of suggestions increased cognitive effort in lows, as indexed by heart-rate increase, but had no effect on the effort expended by highs. Ratings of subjective control were strongly correlated with subjective effort for lows but unrelated for highs. These results support the dissociated-control theory of hypnosis rather than the dissociated-experience or social-cognitive theories.

摘要

在一项关于认知努力在催眠反应中作用的调查中,高催眠易感性和低催眠易感性的参与者根据费力与不费力的催眠暗示产生情绪中性的意象。心率增加作为认知努力的客观指标,并收集了意象生动性、专注度、努力程度和控制感的主观评分。与低催眠易感性参与者相比,高催眠易感性参与者觉得他们的意象更生动、更能引人专注,然而他们的心率显示出其认知努力水平并不比低催眠易感性参与者更高。与暗示的不费力措辞相比,暗示的费力措辞增加了低催眠易感性参与者的认知努力,以心率增加为指标,但对高催眠易感性参与者所付出的努力没有影响。主观控制感评分与低催眠易感性参与者的主观努力密切相关,但与高催眠易感性参与者无关。这些结果支持了催眠的分离控制理论,而非分离体验理论或社会认知理论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验