Waller David, Greenauer Nathan
Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Psychol Res. 2007 May;71(3):322-32. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0087-x. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
Although many previous studies have shown that body-based sensory modalities such as vestibular, kinesthetic, and efferent information are useful for acquiring spatial information about one's immediate environment, relatively little work has examined how these modalities affect the acquisition of long-term spatial memory. Three groups of participants learned locations along a 146 m indoor route, and subsequently pointed to these locations, estimated distances between them, and constructed maps of the environment. One group had access to visual, proprioceptive, and inertial information, another had access to matched visual and matched inertial information, and another had access only to matched visual information. In contrast to previous findings examining transient, online spatial representations, our results showed very few differences among groups in the accuracy of the spatial memories acquired. The only difference was the improved pointing accuracy of participants who had access to proprioceptive information relative to that of participants in the other conditions. Results are discussed in terms of differential sensory contributions to transient and enduring spatial representations.
尽管之前的许多研究表明,基于身体的感觉模态,如前庭觉、动觉和传出信息,对于获取关于自身周围环境的空间信息很有用,但相对较少的研究探讨了这些模态如何影响长期空间记忆的获取。三组参与者学习了沿着一条146米室内路线的位置,随后指向这些位置、估计它们之间的距离,并构建环境地图。一组可以获取视觉、本体感觉和惯性信息,另一组可以获取匹配的视觉和匹配的惯性信息,还有一组只能获取匹配的视觉信息。与之前研究瞬态在线空间表征的结果相反,我们的结果显示,在获取的空间记忆准确性方面,各组之间差异极小。唯一的差异是,相对于其他条件下的参与者,能够获取本体感觉信息的参与者的指向准确性有所提高。我们从不同感觉对瞬态和持久空间表征的贡献方面对结果进行了讨论。