Hertzog Christopher, Lindenberger Ulman, Ghisletta Paolo, Oertzen Timo von
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0170, USA.
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):244-52. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.244.
We evaluated the statistical power of single-indicator latent growth curve models (LGCMs) to detect correlated change between two variables (covariance of slopes) as a function of sample size, number of longitudinal measurement occasions, and reliability (measurement error variance). Power approximations following the method of Satorra and Saris (1985) were used to evaluate the power to detect slope covariances. Even with large samples (N = 500) and several longitudinal occasions (4 or 5), statistical power to detect covariance of slopes was moderate to low unless growth curve reliability at study onset was above .90. Studies using LGCMs may fail to detect slope correlations because of low power rather than a lack of relationship of change between variables. The present findings allow researchers to make more informed design decisions when planning a longitudinal study and aid in interpreting LGCM results regarding correlated interindividual differences in rates of development.
我们评估了单指标潜在增长曲线模型(LGCMs)检测两个变量之间相关变化(斜率协方差)的统计功效,该功效是样本量、纵向测量次数以及信度(测量误差方差)的函数。采用Satorra和Saris(1985)方法的功效近似值来评估检测斜率协方差的功效。即使有大样本(N = 500)和多个纵向测量次数(4次或5次),除非研究开始时增长曲线的信度高于0.90,否则检测斜率协方差的统计功效为中等至较低。使用LGCMs的研究可能因功效低而无法检测到斜率相关性,而非变量之间缺乏变化关系。本研究结果使研究人员在规划纵向研究时能够做出更明智的设计决策,并有助于解释关于个体发育速率相关差异的LGCM结果。