Wenzel Mario, Blanke Elisabeth S, Rowland Zarah, Brose Annette
Psychologisches Institut, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Binger-Str. 14-16, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Affect Sci. 2023 Feb 20;4(2):260-274. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Reappraisal and mindfulness represent two fundamentally different but interconnected ways of dealing with one's emotions: whereas reappraisal is aimed at changing one's thoughts and emotions, mindfulness is aimed at immediately changing, but appreciating them. Despite this difference, prior research has shown that both are beneficial for one's affective well-being. However, research on the spontaneous use of reappraisal and mindfulness in daily life found that they might be differentially associated with positive and negative affect, with reappraisal and mindful attention being more strongly associated with increased positive affect and mindful acceptance with decreased negative affect. Moreover, the spontaneous use of reappraisal may be less effective than mindfulness in daily life given that it is more cognitively taxing. To compare these possibly different benefits (i.e., change in positive and negative affect) and costs (i.e., feeling depleted), we re-analyzed two experience sampling studies ( = 125 and = 179). Regarding benefits, endorsing reappraisal and mindful attention was significantly associated with increases in positive affect, whereas endorsing mindful acceptance was significantly associated with decreases in negative affect. Regarding costs, we found that endorsing reappraisal led to more depletion and that reappraisal was selected less often than mindfulness in daily life. Our results demonstrate the importance of assessing not only the different benefits but also the costs of emotion regulation in daily life.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7.
重新评价和正念代表了两种处理个人情绪的根本不同但相互关联的方式:重新评价旨在改变个人的想法和情绪,而正念旨在不立即改变而是接纳它们。尽管存在这种差异,但先前的研究表明,两者都有利于个人的情感幸福。然而,关于日常生活中自发使用重新评价和正念的研究发现,它们可能与积极和消极情绪有不同的关联,重新评价和正念注意与积极情绪增加的关联更强,而正念接纳与消极情绪减少的关联更强。此外,鉴于重新评价在认知上要求更高,其在日常生活中的自发使用可能不如正念有效。为了比较这些可能不同的益处(即积极和消极情绪的变化)和成本(即感到疲惫),我们重新分析了两项经验抽样研究(样本量分别为125和179)。关于益处,认可重新评价和正念注意与积极情绪的增加显著相关,而认可正念接纳与消极情绪的减少显著相关。关于成本,我们发现认可重新评价会导致更多的疲惫,并且在日常生活中重新评价的选择频率低于正念。我们的结果表明,在日常生活中不仅要评估情绪调节的不同益处,还要评估其成本,这一点很重要。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s42761-022-00178-7获取的补充材料。