Dietrich Jörg, Kempermann Gerd
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;557:191-220. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30128-3_12.
These examples show that stem-cell-based therapy of neuro-psychiatric disorders will not follow a single scheme, but rather include widely different approaches. This is in accordance with the notion that the impact of stem cell biology on neurology will be fundamental, providing a shift in perspective, rather than introducing just one novel therapeutic tool. Stem cell biology, much like genomics and proteomics, offers a "view from within" with an emphasis on a theoretical or real potential and thereby the inherent openness, which is central to the concept of stem cells. Thus, stem cell biology influences many other, more traditional therapeutic approaches, rather than introducing one distinct novel form of therapy. Substantial advances have been made i n neural stemcell research during the years. With the identification of stem and progenitor cells in the adult brain and the complex interaction of different stem cell compartments in the CNS--both, under physiological and pathological conditions--new questions arise: What is the lineage relationship between t he different progenitor cells in the CNS and how much lineage plasticity exists? What are the signals controlling proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells and can these be utilized to allow repair of the CNS? Insights in these questions will help to better understand the role of stem cells during development and aging and the possible relation of impaired or disrupted stem cell function and their impact on both the development and treatment of neurological disease. A number o f studies have indicated a limited neuronal and glial regeneration certain pathological conditions. These fundamental observations have already changed our view on understanding neurological disease and the brain's capacity for endogenous repair. The following years will have to show how we can influence andmodulate endogenous repair nisms by increasing the cellular plasticity in the young and aged CNS.
这些例子表明,基于干细胞的神经精神疾病治疗不会遵循单一方案,而是包括广泛不同的方法。这与干细胞生物学对神经学的影响将是根本性的这一观点一致,它提供了一种视角的转变,而不仅仅是引入一种新的治疗工具。干细胞生物学与基因组学和蛋白质组学非常相似,提供了一种“内部视角”,强调理论或实际潜力以及固有的开放性,这是干细胞概念的核心。因此,干细胞生物学影响许多其他更传统的治疗方法,而不是引入一种独特的新型治疗形式。这些年来,神经干细胞研究取得了重大进展。随着成体脑中干细胞和祖细胞的鉴定以及中枢神经系统中不同干细胞区室在生理和病理条件下的复杂相互作用,新的问题出现了:中枢神经系统中不同祖细胞之间的谱系关系是什么,存在多少谱系可塑性?控制神经干细胞增殖和分化的信号是什么,这些信号能否用于促进中枢神经系统的修复?对这些问题的深入了解将有助于更好地理解干细胞在发育和衰老过程中的作用,以及干细胞功能受损或破坏与神经疾病发生和治疗之间的可能关系。一些研究表明,在某些病理条件下,神经元和神经胶质细胞的再生有限。这些基本观察结果已经改变了我们对神经疾病的理解以及大脑内源性修复能力的看法。接下来的几年将展示我们如何通过增加年轻和老年中枢神经系统中的细胞可塑性来影响和调节内源性修复机制。