Cherie L. Villano, Charles Cleland, Andrew Rosenblum, Chunki Fong, Larry Nuttbrock, and Marie Marthol are affiliated with the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI, Inc.), New York, NY. Joyce Wallace was Executive Director of the Foundation for Research on Sexually Transmitted Diseases (FROST’D), New York, NY.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2004;5(3):33-41. doi: 10.1300/j229v05n03_03.
The present study examines the psychometric properties of a verbal, face-to-face administration of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) with female street-based sex workers (N = 171). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated a poor fit between our data and the instrument's established 5-factor structure. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) yielded four stable and usable factors corresponding to the Emotional Abuse, Emotional Neglect, Physical Abuse, and Sexual Abuse subscales of the CTQ; the Physical Neglect subscale did not emerge as a stable factor. Cross loading of many CTQ items onto more than one factor most likely produced the poor CFA fit, and indicated that abuse/neglect constructs were not conceptually distinct for our sample. Mean trauma scores did not differ significantly from published scores for female substance abusers. According to the CTQ Minimization/Denial scale, 42% of participants minimized their childhood maltreatment experiences. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods may be optimal for the acquisition of sensitive trauma information with wary and vulnerable street populations.
本研究考察了童年创伤问卷(CTQ)的口头、面对面施测方式在女性街头性工作者(N=171)中的心理测量特性。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,我们的数据与该工具既定的 5 因素结构之间存在较差的拟合。探索性因子分析(EFA)得出了四个稳定且可用的因子,分别对应 CTQ 的情感虐待、情感忽视、身体虐待和性虐待分量表;身体忽视分量表没有作为一个稳定的因子出现。许多 CTQ 项目交叉加载到多个因子上,很可能导致 CFA 拟合不佳,并表明在我们的样本中,虐待/忽视结构在概念上并不不同。创伤总得分与女性物质滥用者的已发表得分没有显著差异。根据 CTQ 最小化/否认量表,42%的参与者最小化了他们的童年虐待经历。定性和定量方法的结合可能是获取谨慎和脆弱的街头人群敏感创伤信息的最佳方法。