Paradis I L, Ross C, Dekker A, Dauber J
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 15261.
Acta Cytol. 1990 Jul-Aug;34(4):511-6.
Pneumonia due to Pneumocystis carinii is an increasingly frequent occurrence; a prompt, accurate diagnosis is important to successfully manage this infection. Methenamine silver and toluidine blue stainings of material recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) have been the most widely employed techniques for detecting Pneumocystis organisms. The value of these two staining techniques for the detection of Pneumocystis organisms was prospectively compared in 220 BAL specimens obtained from 186 immunosuppressed individuals. The patients included those with disease-related and therapy-related immunosuppression; half of the BAL specimens came from organ transplant recipients. The results indicate that neither method is superior to the other and that both will correctly identify almost all Pneumocystis infections if a sufficient aliquot of BAL material is examined systematically by trained individuals. The toluidine blue method is somewhat simpler to perform, however. The reasons for discrepant results between the two staining methods were analyzed.
卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的发病率日益增高;及时、准确的诊断对于成功治疗这种感染至关重要。支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)回收材料的亚甲胺银和甲苯胺蓝染色一直是检测肺孢子虫最广泛应用的技术。对从186名免疫抑制个体获得的220份BAL标本中这两种染色技术检测肺孢子虫的价值进行了前瞻性比较。患者包括与疾病相关和与治疗相关免疫抑制的个体;一半的BAL标本来自器官移植受者。结果表明,两种方法都不优于对方,并且如果由训练有素的人员系统检查足够量的BAL材料,两者都能正确识别几乎所有的肺孢子虫感染。然而,甲苯胺蓝方法操作起来稍微简单一些。分析了两种染色方法结果不一致的原因。