van Weringh M, Barendregt D S, Rosema N A M, Timmerman M F, van der Weijden G A
Department of Periodontology, ACTA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2006 Aug;4(3):140-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2006.00187.x.
The aim of the present study was to assess the probing force exerted when using two manual periodontal probes with different handle diameters in hands of different dental professionals.
For this study two periodontal probes with handle diameters of 54 and 92 mm were used. The 11 subjects responsible for the measurements were periodontists, postgraduate periodontal students and dental hygienists. Per measurement session, 20 measurements were performed by each subject. Each probe was used 10 times. After the first baseline measurement session, a second session was performed 1 week later and a last third session another 3 weeks later. Orders for using each probe were randomized for each subject and each session.
The mean overall force with the thin probe was 55.2 g and with the thick probe 59.4 g. The difference of 4.2 g between the two probe types was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.041).
The present study showed that the diameter of the probe handle also had an effect on the force exerted with a periodontal probe. However, the clinical relevance of this difference may be minor, when considering the interindividual variance of forces exerted when probing.
本研究的目的是评估不同牙科专业人员使用两种手柄直径不同的手动牙周探针时施加的探诊力。
本研究使用了两种手柄直径分别为54毫米和92毫米的牙周探针。负责测量的11名受试者为牙周病专家、牙周专业研究生和牙科保健员。每次测量时,每位受试者进行20次测量。每种探针使用10次。在第一次基线测量后,1周后进行第二次测量,再过3周进行最后第三次测量。每种探针的使用顺序在每位受试者和每次测量中都是随机的。
细探针的平均总力为55.2克,粗探针为59.4克。发现两种探针类型之间4.2克的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.041)。
本研究表明,探针手柄的直径也会对牙周探针施加的力产生影响。然而,考虑到探诊时施加力的个体间差异,这种差异的临床相关性可能较小。