Barkhuizen André, Steinfeld Serge, Robbins Jeffery, West Christine, Coombs John, Zwillich Samuel
Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
J Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;33(9):1805-12.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
This was a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 4 treatment arms: celecoxib 200 mg qd, celecoxib 400 mg qd, naproxen 500 mg bid, and placebo. Patients (age 18-75 yrs) requiring daily treatment with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and with a pain intensity on visual analog scale (VAS) > or = 50 mm worsening by 30% compared with a preinclusion visit (14 days prior) were studied. Primary endpoints were least-squares mean changes from baseline in pain intensity, disease activity (patient global assessment VAS), and functional impairment [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)]. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.
Of 611 randomized patients, 137 were allocated to celecoxib 200 mg, 161 to celecoxib 400 mg, 157 to naproxen, and 156 to placebo. Improvements in least-squares mean pain intensity, disease activity, and BASFI scores were significantly greater in the celecoxib 200 mg, celecoxib 400 mg, and naproxen groups than in the placebo group (p < or = 0.001) at Week 12 and the interim timepoints, Weeks 1, 3, and 6. Celecoxib 400 mg was as effective as naproxen; however, naproxen was more effective than celecoxib 200 mg. Celecoxib was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to placebo. However, 3 naproxen-treated patients experienced serious treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (one severe gastric ulcer, one moderate GI hemorrhage, one severe GI hemorrhage).
In this 12-week study, celecoxib 200 mg qd and 400 mg qd were efficacious and well tolerated in treating signs and symptoms of AS.
评估塞来昔布治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的疗效和安全性。
这是一项为期12周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,有4个治疗组:塞来昔布200毫克每日一次、塞来昔布400毫克每日一次、萘普生500毫克每日两次以及安慰剂。研究对象为年龄在18至75岁之间、需要每日使用非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗且视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛强度≥50毫米且相较于入组前访视(14天前)恶化30%的患者。主要终点为疼痛强度、疾病活动度(患者整体评估VAS)和功能障碍[巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)]自基线起的最小二乘均值变化。在整个研究过程中监测不良事件。
611例随机分组患者中,137例被分配至塞来昔布200毫克组,161例至塞来昔布400毫克组,157例至萘普生组,156例至安慰剂组。在第12周以及第1、3和6周的中期时间点,塞来昔布200毫克组、塞来昔布400毫克组和萘普生组的最小二乘均值疼痛强度、疾病活动度和BASFI评分的改善显著大于安慰剂组(p≤0.001)。塞来昔布400毫克与萘普生疗效相当;然而,萘普生比塞来昔布200毫克更有效。塞来昔布耐受性良好,不良事件谱与安慰剂相似。然而,3例接受萘普生治疗的患者出现了严重的治疗相关胃肠道(GI)不良事件(1例严重胃溃疡、1例中度GI出血、1例严重GI出血)。
在这项为期12周的研究中,塞来昔布200毫克每日一次和400毫克每日一次在治疗AS的体征和症状方面有效且耐受性良好。