Williams Gary W, Kivitz Alan J, Brown Mark T, Verburg Kenneth M
Department of Medicine, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):204-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.016.
The primary aim of this work was to compare the efficacy of valdecoxib 10, 20, and 40 mg QD with that of placebo and naproxen 500 mg BID in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall safety and tolerability profiles of valdecoxib and naproxen were also compared.
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled study was performed in patients with adult-onset RA whose disease was in a flare state after discontinuing NSAIDs or other analgesics. Patients were randomly assigned to valdecoxib 10, 20, or 40 mg QD, naproxen 500 mg BID, or placebo. The primary efficacy measures were the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% responder index (ACR-20), physicians' assessments of tender/painful joint count and swollen joint count, and patients' and physicians' global assessments of disease activity. Adverse events, clinical laboratory data, and vital signs were assessed by the investigator and compared between treatment groups to evaluate overall tolerability and safety.
A total of 1093 patients were randomized to receive either valdecoxib 10 mg QD (n=226), valdecoxib 20 mg QD (n=219), valdecoxib 40 mg QD (n=209), naproxen 500 mg BID (n=219), or placebo (n=220). At all time points, the proportion of ACR-20 responders was significantly higher in the valdecoxib groups than the placebo group at weeks 2 (10 mg, P<0.001; 20 mg, P=0.008; 40 mg, P= 0.004), 6 (all, P<0.001), and 12 (10 mg, P=0.006; 20 mg, P=0.004; 40 mg, P<0.001). Similarly, at all time points, the proportion of ACR-20 responders was significantly higher in the naproxen 500-mg group than the placebo group (all time points, P<0.001). In addition, mean changes in the number of tender/painful joint counts were significantly greater in the valdecoxib groups than the placebo group at weeks 2 (all, P<0.001), 6 (10 mg, P=0.002; 20 and 40 mg, P<0.001), and 12 (10 mg, P=0.004; 20 mg, P= 0.012; 40 mg, P<0.001). Naproxen treatment was also associated with greater reductions in tender/painful joint count than placebo (all, P<0.001). Mean changes in swollen joint count decreased at all time points in all groups, with significantly greater changes in the valdecoxib and naproxen treatment groups than the placebo group (valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg: week 6, P= 0.014 and P=0.003, respectively; naproxen: week 2, P=0.014; week 6, P=0.015; week 12, P=0.030). Physicians' global assessments of disease activity scores were significantly lower in the valdecoxib (10 mg: weeks 2 and 6, P<0.001; week 12, P=0.001; 20 and 40 mg: all weeks, P<0.001) and naproxen (all time points, P<0.001) treatment groups than the placebo group. Adverse events were reported by 45.5% patients in the placebo group, 51.8% in the valdecoxib 10 mg QD group, 58.0% in the valdecoxib 20 mg QD group, 56.9% in the valdecoxib 40 mg QD group, and 62.6% in the naproxen 500 mg BID treatment group.
Valdecoxib 10, 20, and 40 mg QD were efficacious for treating the signs and symptoms of RA in these patients. The efficacy of valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg QD was not significantly different from that of naproxen 500 mg BID. Valdecoxib was generally well tolerated in this study.
本研究的主要目的是比较每日一次服用10毫克、20毫克和40毫克伐地考昔与安慰剂及每日两次服用500毫克萘普生对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效。同时还比较了伐地考昔和萘普生的总体安全性和耐受性。
对成年起病的RA患者进行了一项为期12周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂和活性药物对照研究,这些患者在停用非甾体抗炎药或其他镇痛药后疾病处于发作状态。患者被随机分配至每日一次服用10毫克、20毫克或40毫克伐地考昔组、每日两次服用500毫克萘普生组或安慰剂组。主要疗效指标为美国风湿病学会(ACR)20%反应者指数(ACR-20)、医生对压痛/疼痛关节计数和肿胀关节计数的评估,以及患者和医生对疾病活动的整体评估。研究者评估不良事件、临床实验室数据和生命体征,并在各治疗组之间进行比较,以评估总体耐受性和安全性。
共有1093例患者被随机分配接受每日一次服用10毫克伐地考昔(n = 226)、每日一次服用20毫克伐地考昔(n = 219)、每日一次服用40毫克伐地考昔(n = 209)、每日两次服用500毫克萘普生(n = 219)或安慰剂(n = 220)。在所有时间点,伐地考昔组中ACR-20反应者的比例在第2周(10毫克,P < 0.001;20毫克,P = 0.008;40毫克,P = 0.004)、第6周(所有剂量,P < 0.001)和第12周(10毫克,P = 0.006;20毫克,P = 0.004;40毫克,P < 0.001)均显著高于安慰剂组。同样,在所有时间点,500毫克萘普生组中ACR-20反应者的比例均显著高于安慰剂组(所有时间点,P < 0.001)。此外,在第2周(所有剂量,P < 0.001)、第6周(10毫克,P = 0.002;20毫克和40毫克,P < 0.001)和第12周(10毫克,P = 0.004;20毫克,P = 0.012;40毫克,P < 0.001),伐地考昔组压痛/疼痛关节计数的平均变化显著大于安慰剂组。萘普生治疗组压痛/疼痛关节计数的减少也比安慰剂组更显著(所有剂量,P < 0.001)。所有组中肿胀关节计数的平均变化在所有时间点均下降,伐地考昔和萘普生治疗组的变化显著大于安慰剂组(20毫克和40毫克伐地考昔:第6周,分别为P = 0.014和P = 0.003;萘普生:第2周,P = 0.014;第6周,P = 0.015;第12周,P = 0.030)。医生对疾病活动评分的整体评估在伐地考昔(10毫克:第2周和第6周,P < 0.001;第12周,P = 0.001;20毫克和40毫克:所有周,P < 0.001)和萘普生(所有时间点,P < 0.001)治疗组中显著低于安慰剂组。安慰剂组45.5%的患者报告了不良事件,每日一次服用10毫克伐地考昔组为51.8%,每日一次服用20毫克伐地考昔组为58.0%,每日一次服用40毫克伐地考昔组为56.9%,每日两次服用500毫克萘普生治疗组为62.6%。
每日一次服用10毫克、20毫克和4毫克伐地考昔对这些患者的RA体征和症状有效。每日一次服用20毫克和40毫克伐地考昔的疗效与每日两次服用500毫克萘普生的疗效无显著差异。在本研究中,伐地考昔总体耐受性良好。