Dimich-Ward H, Chow Y, Chung J, Trask C
Department of Medicine, Respiratory Division, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Sep;36(9):1122-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02556.x.
A 'protective farm factor' possibly related to livestock exposure is hypothesized to reduce the risk for allergic sensitization.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether 4-H club youth, who have opportunities for contact with livestock through club activities, have reduced risks of respiratory and allergic symptoms according to residence on a farm or exposure to livestock.
A cross-sectional postal survey was completed by British Columbia 4-H members 8-20 years of age; a subset underwent skin prick testing as well. The association of farm residence and livestock exposure variables with symptoms were evaluated using logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, cat and/or dog ownership, parental history of allergic disease, parental education, number of older siblings and exposure to smokers at home.
Questionnaires were completed by 1158 participants (response rate 50.3%); of these, a subset of 317 had skin prick tests (SPTs) (response rate 64.4%). Current residence on a farm was associated with a lower prevalence of ever having wheeze and asthma, as well as symptoms of atopic dermatitis. Variables relating to residence in a farm or rural area with livestock were more strongly associated with respiratory and allergic symptoms than were the livestock exposure variables such as frequency of contact and hours of barn use. The adjusted odds ratios for living in a farm residence in comparison with a rural non-livestock area were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.89) for diagnosed asthma, 0.51 (95% CI 0.30-0.85) for allergic rhinitis and 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) for atopic dermatitis.
Our findings suggest that some aspects of the farm environment, not just attributable to contact with livestock, were protective for respiratory and allergic conditions among 4-H youth.
据推测,一种可能与接触家畜有关的“农场保护因素”可降低过敏致敏风险。
本研究旨在确定通过俱乐部活动有机会接触家畜的4-H俱乐部青年,根据其在农场居住情况或家畜接触情况,呼吸道和过敏症状风险是否降低。
不列颠哥伦比亚省8至20岁的4-H成员完成了一项横断面邮政调查;其中一部分人还接受了皮肤点刺试验。使用逻辑回归评估农场居住和家畜接触变量与症状之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、猫和/或狗的饲养情况、父母过敏疾病史、父母教育程度、哥哥姐姐数量以及在家接触吸烟者情况进行了调整。
1158名参与者完成了问卷调查(回复率50.3%);其中,317人进行了皮肤点刺试验(SPT)(回复率64.4%)。目前居住在农场与曾经患喘息和哮喘以及特应性皮炎症状的患病率较低有关。与居住在有家畜的农场或农村地区相关的变量,比家畜接触变量如接触频率和畜舍使用时长,与呼吸道和过敏症状的关联更强。与农村非家畜区相比,居住在农场的调整后比值比,诊断哮喘为0.49(95%置信区间(CI)0.27 - 0.89),过敏性鼻炎为0.51(95%CI 0.30 - 0.85),特应性皮炎为0.45(95%CI 0.24 - 0.84)。
我们的研究结果表明,农场环境的某些方面,不仅仅是与接触家畜有关,对4-H青年的呼吸道和过敏状况具有保护作用。