BeLue R, Taylor-Richardson K D, Lin J, Rivera A T, Grandison D
The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Health Policy and Methodology Center, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Dec;27(6):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
To explore gender differences in perceptions of 1) barriers and motivators to participation in clinical trials and perceived need of clinical trials and 2) perceptions of risks and benefits of participation in clinical trials in African American men and women.
Focus groups were conducted among African American participants by gender. A total of 67 African American participated in the focus groups. All focus groups were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed by combining the key elements of grounded theory and content analysis with the assistance of the qualitative software ATLAS.ti 5.0.
Different themes emerged for men versus women. The business and economic of research were important to male participants. The researcher-participant relationship emerged as one of the strongest themes related to potential female participation in research.
Focus group results indicate that African American men and women present different preferences, beliefs and barriers to participation. Men expressed the desire to know information on funding issues, financial benefit and impact of the research. Women expressed the desire to be treated respectfully and as an individual as opposed to just a study subject. Integrating gender preferences into researcher-participant interactions, advertisement, informed consent delivery and advertisement of research studies may lead to increased participation rates. Discussing and presenting relevant information on clinical research funding mechanisms, and the business of clinical research with potential participants may be helpful in building trust with the researcher and the research team. Creating a process for information exchange and methods to minimize the power imbalance between the researcher and participant may also build trust and help participants feel more comfortable to participate in research.
探讨非裔美国男性和女性在以下方面认知上的性别差异:1) 参与临床试验的障碍和动机以及对临床试验的感知需求;2) 对参与临床试验的风险和益处的认知。
按性别对非裔美国参与者进行焦点小组访谈。共有67名非裔美国人参与了焦点小组访谈。所有焦点小组访谈均进行了录音并逐字转录。在定性软件ATLAS.ti 5.0的辅助下,结合扎根理论和内容分析的关键要素进行数据分析。
男性和女性出现了不同的主题。研究的商业和经济因素对男性参与者很重要。研究者与参与者的关系成为与女性参与研究可能性相关的最突出主题之一。
焦点小组结果表明,非裔美国男性和女性在参与研究的偏好、信念和障碍方面存在差异。男性表示希望了解有关资金问题、经济利益和研究影响的信息。女性表示希望被尊重对待,被当作个体而非仅仅是研究对象。将性别偏好纳入研究者与参与者的互动、广告宣传、知情同意书的提供以及研究的广告宣传中,可能会提高参与率。与潜在参与者讨论并提供有关临床研究资金机制以及临床研究商业方面的相关信息,可能有助于与研究者和研究团队建立信任。创建信息交流流程以及尽量减少研究者与参与者之间权力不平衡的方法,也可能建立信任并帮助参与者更自在地参与研究。