Hansen William B, Dusenbury Linda, Bishop Dana, Derzon James H
Tanglewood Research, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2007 Jun;22(3):351-60. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl091. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
We conducted an analysis of programs listed on the National Registry of Effective Programs and Practices as of 2003. This analysis focused on programs that addressed substance abuse prevention from among those on the effective or model program lists and that had manuals. A total of 48 programs met these inclusion criteria. We coded program manuals for content that was covered based on how much time was devoted to changing targeted mediating variables. The value of this approach is that program content can be judged using an impartial standard that can be applied to a wide range of intervention approaches. On average, programs addressed eight of 23 possible content areas. Our analyses suggested there were seven distinguishable approaches that have been used in substance abuse prevention programs. These include (i) changing access within the environment, (ii) promoting the development of personal and social skills, (iii) promoting positive affiliation, (iv) addressing social influences, (v) providing social support and helping participants develop goals and alternatives, (vi) developing positive schools and (vii) enhancing motivation to avoid substance use. We propose that the field use such analyses as the basis of future theory development.
我们对截至2003年列于国家有效项目和实践登记册上的项目进行了分析。该分析聚焦于那些在有效或示范项目清单中涉及药物滥用预防且有手册的项目。共有48个项目符合这些纳入标准。我们根据用于改变目标中介变量的时间多少,对手册内容进行编码。这种方法的价值在于,项目内容可以使用一种公正的标准来评判,该标准可应用于广泛的干预方法。平均而言,项目涉及了23个可能内容领域中的8个。我们的分析表明,在药物滥用预防项目中使用了7种可区分的方法。这些方法包括:(i)改变环境中的获取途径;(ii)促进个人和社交技能的发展;(iii)促进积极的人际关系;(iv)应对社会影响;(v)提供社会支持并帮助参与者制定目标和选择;(vi)建设积极向上的学校;(vii)增强避免使用药物的动机。我们建议该领域将此类分析作为未来理论发展的基础。