Steyerberg Ewout W, Neville Bridget A, Koppert Linetta B, Lemmens Valery E P P, Tilanus Hugo W, Coebergh Jan-Willem W, Weeks Jane C, Earle Craig C
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 10;24(26):4277-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0658.
Surgery has curative potential in a proportion of patients with esophageal cancer, but is associated with considerable perioperative risks. We aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score for surgical mortality that could be applied to administrative data.
We analyzed 3,592 esophagectomy patients from four cohorts. We applied logistic regression analysis to predict mortality occurring within 30 days after esophagectomy for 1,327 esophageal cancer patients older than 65 years of age, diagnosed between 1991 and 1996 in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)--Medicare database. A simple score chart for preoperative risk assessment of surgical mortality was developed and validated on three other cohorts, including 714 SEER-Medicare patients diagnosed between 1997 and 1999, 349 patients from a population-based registry in the Netherlands diagnosed between 1993 and 2001, and 1,202 patients from a referral hospital in the Netherlands diagnosed between 1980 and 2002.
Surgical mortality in the four cohorts was 11% (147 of 1,327), 10% (74 of 714), 7% (25 of 349), and 4% (45 of 1,202), respectively. Predictive patient characteristics included age, comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and diabetes), preoperative radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy, and a relatively low hospital volume. At validation, the simple score showed good agreement of predicted risks with observed mortality rates (calibration), but low discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.58 to 0.66).
A simple risk score combining clinical characteristics along with hospital volume to predict surgical mortality after esophagectomy from administrative data may form a basis for risk adjustment in quality of care assessment.
手术对部分食管癌患者具有治愈潜力,但与相当大的围手术期风险相关。我们旨在开发并验证一种可应用于管理数据的简单手术死亡率风险评分。
我们分析了来自四个队列的3592例食管切除术患者。我们应用逻辑回归分析来预测1991年至1996年间在关联的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库中诊断出的1327例65岁以上食管癌患者食管切除术后30天内发生的死亡率。制定了一个用于手术死亡率术前风险评估的简单评分表,并在其他三个队列中进行了验证,包括1997年至1999年间诊断出的714例SEER-医疗保险患者、1993年至2001年间在荷兰基于人群登记处的349例患者以及1980年至2002年间在荷兰一家转诊医院的1202例患者。
四个队列中的手术死亡率分别为11%(1327例中的147例)、10%(714例中的74例)、7%(349例中的25例)和4%(1202例中的45例)。预测患者特征包括年龄、合并症(心脏、肺部、肾脏、肝脏和糖尿病)、术前放疗或联合放化疗以及相对较低的医院手术量。在验证时,简单评分显示预测风险与观察到的死亡率(校准)有良好的一致性,但鉴别能力较低(受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.58至0.66)。
一种结合临床特征和医院手术量以从管理数据预测食管切除术后手术死亡率的简单风险评分,可能构成护理质量评估中风险调整的基础。