Leschka Sebastian, Wildermuth Simon, Boehm Thomas, Desbiolles Lotus, Husmann Lars, Plass André, Koepfli Pascal, Schepis Tiziano, Marincek Borut, Kaufmann Philipp A, Alkadhi Hatem
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, the Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, and the Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):378-85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051384. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
To evaluate prospectively the effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality at 64-section computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography.
The study protocol had local ethics committee approval; written informed consent was obtained. There were 125 patients (45 women, 80 men; mean age, 59.9 years +/- 12.9 [standard deviation]; 79 receiving beta-blockers) who underwent 64-section CT coronary angiography with retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 20% to 80% of R-R interval. Heart rate variability was calculated as 1 standard deviation from mean rate during scanning. Two observers rated image quality of each coronary segment at least 1.5-mm diameter (1 = no motion artifacts, 5 = not evaluative). Repeated analysis of variance measurements were performed to evaluate quantitative parameters. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to compare image quality in each patient with average heart rate and heart rate variability.
Average heart rate was 63.3 beats per minute +/- 13.1, with variability of 3.2 beats per minute +/- 2.1. Diagnostic image quality (score < or = 3) was attained in 1821 of 1836 segments at the best reconstruction interval. There was no correlation between mean heart rate and image quality for all segments of the right coronary and left anterior descending arteries, but there was a significant correlation for left circumflex artery (r = 0.33, P < .05). Heart rate variability was correlated with image quality overall (r = 0.75, P < .001) and for each coronary artery. Heart rate was less variable and image quality was better (P < .05) in patients receiving beta-blockers. Best image quality was obtained in diastole with heart rate less than 80 beats per minute and in systole with faster heart rate.
Coronary angiography with 64-section CT provides diagnostic image quality within a wide range of heart rates. Reducing average heart rate and heart rate variability is beneficial for reducing artifacts.
前瞻性评估平均心率和心率变异性对64层计算机断层扫描(CT)冠状动脉造影图像质量的影响。
本研究方案获得当地伦理委员会批准;获得了书面知情同意书。125例患者(45例女性,80例男性;平均年龄59.9岁±12.9[标准差];79例接受β受体阻滞剂治疗)接受了64层CT冠状动脉造影及回顾性心电图门控。数据集在R-R间期的20%至80%以5%的步长重建。心率变异性计算为扫描期间平均心率的1个标准差。两名观察者对每个直径至少1.5毫米的冠状动脉节段的图像质量进行评分(1=无运动伪影;5=无法评估)。进行重复方差分析测量以评估定量参数。进行Pearson相关分析以比较每位患者的图像质量与平均心率和心率变异性。
平均心率为63.3次/分钟±13.1,变异性为3.2次/分钟±2.1。在最佳重建间期,1836个节段中的1821个节段获得了诊断性图像质量(评分≤3)。右冠状动脉和左前降支动脉所有节段的平均心率与图像质量之间无相关性,但左旋支动脉存在显著相关性(r=0.33,P<.05)。心率变异性与整体图像质量(r=0.75,P<.001)以及每条冠状动脉的图像质量均相关。接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者心率变异性较小且图像质量较好(P<.05)。在心率低于80次/分钟的舒张期和心率较快的收缩期可获得最佳图像质量。
64层CT冠状动脉造影在较宽的心率范围内可提供诊断性图像质量。降低平均心率和心率变异性有助于减少伪影。