• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估hMLH1和hMSH2突变概率模型的预测准确性。

Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models.

作者信息

Jasperson Kory W, Lowstuter Katrina, Weitzel Jeffrey N

机构信息

Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010-3000, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2006 Oct;15(5):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9035-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-006-9035-6
PMID:16969708
Abstract

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is characterized by a susceptibility to colorectal and extra-colonic cancers. Several guidelines exist for the identification of families suspected of having HNPCC, however these guidelines lack adequate sensitivity and specificity. In an attempt to improve accuracy for the detection of individuals with HNPCC, the Wijnen pre-test probability model (1998) and Myriad Genetics Laboratory prevalence table (2004) were developed. Here we evaluate the Wijnen model and Myriad table at predicting the presence of a mutation in individuals undergoing genetic testing for HNPCC. Forty-nine patients who had undergone genetic testing for germline mutations in hMLH1 and/or hMSH2 were part of our analysis. Our results revealed that the revised Bethesda guidelines performed with the highest sensitivity for germline mutations (94.4%), however the specificity was low (12.9%). Using a 10.0% mutation probability threshold, the Wijnen model and Myriad table had sensitivities of 55.6 and 60.0%, respectively and specificities of 54.8 and 23.8%, respectively. The Wijnen model and Myriad table were poor predictors of mutation prevalence, which is shown by the areas underneath their corresponding receiver operator characteristic curves (0.616 and 0.400, respectively). The results of this study demonsrate that neither the Wijnen model nor the Myriad table are sensitive or specific enough to be used as the only indication when to offer genetic testing for HNPCC.

摘要

遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)的特征是易患结直肠癌和结外癌症。目前有多项指南用于识别疑似患有HNPCC的家族,但这些指南的敏感性和特异性不足。为提高检测HNPCC个体的准确性,开发了维嫩(Wijnen)预测试概率模型(1998年)和Myriad Genetics实验室患病率表(2004年)。在此,我们评估维嫩模型和Myriad表在预测接受HNPCC基因检测个体中突变存在情况时的表现。49例接受hMLH1和/或hMSH2种系突变基因检测的患者参与了我们的分析。我们的结果显示,修订后的贝塞斯达指南对种系突变的敏感性最高(94.4%),但特异性较低(12.9%)。使用10.0%的突变概率阈值时,维嫩模型和Myriad表的敏感性分别为55.6%和60.0%,特异性分别为54.8%和23.8%。维嫩模型和Myriad表对突变患病率的预测能力较差,这在它们相应的受试者工作特征曲线下面积中得到体现(分别为0.616和0.400)。本研究结果表明,维嫩模型和Myriad表的敏感性和特异性都不足以作为决定何时为HNPCC提供基因检测的唯一依据。

相似文献

1
Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models.评估hMLH1和hMSH2突变概率模型的预测准确性。
J Genet Couns. 2006 Oct;15(5):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9035-6.
2
[Mutation analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes in Chinese hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families].[中国遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家系中hMSH2和hMLH1基因的突变分析]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Aug;32(4):323-8.
3
[Clinical features and hMSH2/hMLH1 germline mutation screening of Chinese hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients].中国遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者的临床特征及hMSH2/hMLH1种系突变筛查
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 May 2;84(9):714-7.
4
[Mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer].疑似遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中hMLH1和hMSH2基因的突变
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1999 May;79(5):346-8.
5
Clinical performance of original and revised Bethesda guidelines for the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: proposal of a new and simpler set of recommendations.用于识别新诊断结直肠癌患者中MSH2/MLH1基因携带者的原始及修订版贝塞斯达指南的临床性能:一套新的更简化建议方案
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):1104-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00522.x.
6
[Current concepts in the genetics of hereditary and sporadic colorectal cancer and the role of genetics in patient management. Hereditary colorectal cancers].[遗传性和散发性结直肠癌遗传学的当前概念以及遗传学在患者管理中的作用。遗传性结直肠癌]
Orv Hetil. 2006 Feb 26;147(8):363-8.
7
Germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 mismatch repair genes in Belgian hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) patients.比利时遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)患者中hMLH1和hMSH2错配修复基因的种系突变
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(2):179-89. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-5958-6.
8
Risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer for carriers of mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene: correction for ascertainment.hMLH1和hMSH2基因突变携带者患结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌的风险:校正确诊率。
J Med Genet. 2005 Jun;42(6):491-6. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024299.
9
Mutational analysis of promoters of mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and early onset colorectal cancer patients: identification of three novel germ-line mutations in promoter of the hMSH2 gene.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌和早发性结直肠癌患者错配修复基因hMSH2和hMLH1启动子的突变分析:hMSH2基因启动子中三个新的种系突变的鉴定
Cancer Res. 2002 Jan 1;62(1):38-42.
10
[Detection mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in Colombian families with suspicion of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (Lynch syndrome)].[对疑似遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(林奇综合征)的哥伦比亚家族中hMLH1和hMSH2基因的DNA错配修复基因进行突变检测]
Biomedica. 2005 Sep;25(3):315-24.

引用本文的文献

1
A validation of models for prediction of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes.预测错配修复基因中致病性变异模型的验证。
Genet Med. 2022 Oct;24(10):2155-2166. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
The identification of Lynch syndrome in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省林奇综合征的鉴定。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;23(11):761-7. doi: 10.1155/2009/620518.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunohistochemistry identifies carriers of mismatch repair gene defects causing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.免疫组织化学可识别导致遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的错配修复基因缺陷携带者。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4705-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.180.
2
Novel strategy for optimal sequential application of clinical criteria, immunohistochemistry and microsatellite analysis in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌诊断中临床标准、免疫组织化学和微卫星分析最佳序贯应用的新策略
Int J Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;118(1):115-22. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21313.
3
Deletions account for 17% of pathogenic germline alterations in MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families.
在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)家族中,缺失占MLH1和MSH2致病种系改变的17%。
Genet Test. 2005 Summer;9(2):138-46. doi: 10.1089/gte.2005.9.138.
4
Evaluating the impact of genetic counseling and testing with signal detection methods.
J Genet Couns. 2005 Feb;14(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-1497-4.
5
Refining the Amsterdam Criteria and Bethesda Guidelines: testing algorithms for the prediction of mismatch repair mutation status in the familial cancer clinic.完善阿姆斯特丹标准和贝塞斯达指南:在家族性癌症诊所测试错配修复突变状态预测算法
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;22(24):4934-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.084.
6
Mutations associated with HNPCC predisposition -- Update of ICG-HNPCC/INSiGHT mutation database.与遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌易感性相关的突变——ICG-HNPCC/INSiGHT突变数据库更新
Dis Markers. 2004;20(4-5):269-76. doi: 10.1155/2004/305058.
7
Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.与携带MLH1或MSH2突变的家族相比,27个携带致病性MSH6种系突变的家族中结直肠癌发病率较低且发病年龄较晚:德国遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌联盟
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22(22):4486-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.033. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
8
An update on the genetics of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌遗传学的最新进展。
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Oct 1;13 Spec No 2:R177-85. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh247.
9
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an approach to the selection of candidates to genetic testing based on clinical and molecular characteristics.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:基于临床和分子特征选择基因检测候选者的方法
Community Genet. 1998;1(4):229-36. doi: 10.1159/000016168.
10
Current clinical selection strategies for identification of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families are inadequate: a meta-analysis.目前用于识别遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族的临床选择策略并不充分:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Genet. 2004 Apr;65(4):308-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00220.x.