• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不列颠哥伦比亚省林奇综合征的鉴定。

The identification of Lynch syndrome in British Columbia.

作者信息

Cremin Carol M, Armstrong Linlea, Gill Sharlene, Huntsman David, Bajdik Chris

机构信息

Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;23(11):761-7. doi: 10.1155/2009/620518.

DOI:10.1155/2009/620518
PMID:19893772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2777089/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of Lynch syndrome mutations in a Canadian hereditary cancer clinic population, and to determine the effectiveness of the program's referral criteria and testing algorithm.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who were referred for and received genetic counselling at the BC Cancer Agency's Hereditary Cancer Program for a family history of colon cancer from August 1, 2004, to September 1, 2006, was performed. Charts were reviewed for referral criteria met, cancer history, whether testing was offered and the outcome of testing.

RESULTS

Lynch syndrome was confirmed or highly suspected in 14.3% of index test patients (eight of 56) by the identification of a deleterious mutation or variant likely to be deleterious in either of the hMLH1 or hMSH2 mismatch repair genes. In the program, the two most effective criteria were a personal diagnosis of two or more primary Lynch syndrome-related cancers (one diagnosed at younger than 50 years of age) or two first-degree relatives with a Lynch syndrome-related cancer (both diagnosed at younger than 50 years of age). The respective positive predictive values of these two criteria were calculated to be 66.7% (95% CI 40% to 93%) and 58.3% (95% CI 30.4% to 86.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Hereditary Cancer Program developed and successfully implemented an approach that selected individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome with a significant pretest probability of mutation of 14.3%. Improved ascertainment of families with Lynch syndrome will require greater physician awareness of referral criteria, program advances in the testing algorithm and a population-based approach to screening incident colon cancers.

摘要

目的

确定加拿大遗传性癌症门诊患者中林奇综合征突变的患病率,并确定该项目转诊标准和检测算法的有效性。

方法

对2004年8月1日至2006年9月1日期间因结肠癌家族史被转介至不列颠哥伦比亚癌症机构遗传性癌症项目并接受遗传咨询的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。审查病历以确定是否符合转诊标准、癌症病史、是否提供检测以及检测结果。

结果

通过鉴定hMLH1或hMSH2错配修复基因中可能有害的有害突变或变异,在14.3%的索引检测患者(56例中的8例)中确诊或高度怀疑林奇综合征。在该项目中,两个最有效的标准是个人诊断患有两种或更多原发性林奇综合征相关癌症(其中一种在50岁之前诊断)或两名一级亲属患有林奇综合征相关癌症(均在50岁之前诊断)。这两个标准各自的阳性预测值经计算分别为66.7%(95%CI 40%至93%)和58.3%(95%CI 30.4%至86.2%)。

结论

遗传性癌症项目制定并成功实施了一种方法,该方法筛选出有林奇综合征风险且突变前检测概率高达14.3%的个体。要更好地确定林奇综合征家族,需要医生提高对转诊标准的认识、检测算法方面的项目进展以及基于人群的方法来筛查偶发性结肠癌。

相似文献

1
The identification of Lynch syndrome in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省林奇综合征的鉴定。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;23(11):761-7. doi: 10.1155/2009/620518.
2
Combined Microsatellite Instability, MLH1 Methylation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry for Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers From GOG210: An NRG Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.联合微卫星不稳定性、MLH1甲基化分析及免疫组织化学用于妇科肿瘤学组GOG210子宫内膜癌林奇综合征筛查:一项NRG肿瘤学与妇科肿瘤学组研究
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4301-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9518. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
[Detection mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in Colombian families with suspicion of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (Lynch syndrome)].[对疑似遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(林奇综合征)的哥伦比亚家族中hMLH1和hMSH2基因的DNA错配修复基因进行突变检测]
Biomedica. 2005 Sep;25(3):315-24.
4
Simplified identification of Lynch syndrome: a prospective, multicenter study.林奇综合征的简化识别:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Jun;44(6):515-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
5
Counterpoint: implementing population genetic screening for Lynch Syndrome among newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients--will the ends justify the means?**观点**:对新诊断的结直肠癌患者实施林奇综合征人群遗传筛查——手段是否能证明目的合理?
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 May;8(5):606-11. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0045.
6
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives.EGAPP工作组的建议:针对新诊断的结直肠癌患者的基因检测策略,旨在降低亲属患林奇综合征的发病率和死亡率。
Genet Med. 2009 Jan;11(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818fa2ff.
7
Prospective determination of prevalence of lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer.对年轻子宫内膜癌女性林奇综合征患病率的前瞻性测定。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5158-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8597. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
8
Lack of referral for genetic counseling and testing in BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndromes: a nationwide study based on 240,134 consultations and 134,652 genetic tests.BRCA1/2 和 Lynch 综合征患者缺乏遗传咨询和检测转诊:基于 240134 次就诊和 134652 次基因检测的全国性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2669-9. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
9
Lynch syndrome in a predominantly Afrocentric population: a clinicopathological and genetic study.以非裔为主体的人群中的林奇综合征:临床病理和遗传学研究。
Can J Surg. 2012 Oct;55(5):294-300. doi: 10.1503/cjs.037410.
10
Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中生殖系突变及癌症风险的预测
JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1479-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1479.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Genomic Heterogeneity to Inform Therapeutic Decisions for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Application of the Value of Heterogeneity Framework.利用基因组异质性为转移性结直肠癌的治疗决策提供信息:异质性框架价值的应用
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):441-452. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00926-9. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
2
Recognition of Lynch Syndrome Amongst Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancers at St. Paul's Hospital.圣保禄医院新诊断结直肠癌患者的林奇综合征识别。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2017:9625638. doi: 10.1155/2017/9625638. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
3
Efficacy of an educational intervention on family physicians' risk assessment and management of colorectal cancer.一项教育干预措施对家庭医生结直肠癌风险评估与管理的效果
J Community Genet. 2014 Oct;5(4):303-11. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0185-1. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting the performance of a genetic testing service for cancer susceptibility.预测癌症易感性基因检测服务的性能。
Genet Test. 2007 Winter;11(4):381-6. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0031.
2
Prospective determination of prevalence of lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer.对年轻子宫内膜癌女性林奇综合征患病率的前瞻性测定。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5158-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8597. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
3
Incorporation of somatic BRAF mutation testing into an algorithm for the investigation of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.将体细胞BRAF突变检测纳入遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的诊断流程。
Fam Cancer. 2007;6(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s10689-007-9124-1. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
4
Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中生殖系突变及癌症风险的预测
JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1479-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1479.
5
Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models.评估hMLH1和hMSH2突变概率模型的预测准确性。
J Genet Couns. 2006 Oct;15(5):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9035-6.
6
Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer: the rise and fall of a confusing term.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:一个令人困惑的术语的兴衰
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 21;12(31):4943-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i31.4943.
7
Diagnostic approach and management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma): a guide for clinicians.林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)的诊断方法与管理:临床医生指南
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Jul-Aug;56(4):213-25. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.4.213.
8
Clinicopathologic significance of defective DNA mismatch repair in endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌中DNA错配修复缺陷的临床病理意义
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 10;24(11):1745-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1574. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
9
Lynch syndrome genes.林奇综合征基因
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(3):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s10689-004-7993-0.
10
Lower cancer incidence in Amsterdam-I criteria families without mismatch repair deficiency: familial colorectal cancer type X.阿姆斯特丹-I标准家族中无错配修复缺陷的癌症发病率较低:X型家族性结直肠癌
JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):1979-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1979.