Baranov Pavel V, Vestergaard Bente, Hamelryck Thomas, Gesteland Raymond F, Nyborg Jens, Atkins John F
Bioscience Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Biol Direct. 2006 Sep 13;1:28. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-1-28.
While all codons that specify amino acids are universally recognized by tRNA molecules, codons signaling termination of translation are recognized by proteins known as class-I release factors (RF). In most eukaryotes and archaea a single RF accomplishes termination at all three stop codons. In most bacteria, there are two RFs with overlapping specificity, RF1 recognizes UA(A/G) and RF2 recognizes U(A/G)A.
First, we hypothesize that orthologues of the E. coli K12 pseudogene prfH encode a third class-I RF that we designate RFH. Second, it is likely that RFH responds to signals other than conventional stop codons. Supporting evidence comes from the following facts: (i) A number of bacterial genomes contain prfH orthologues with no discernable interruptions in their ORFs. (ii) RFH shares strong sequence similarity with other class-I bacterial RFs. (iii) RFH contains a highly conserved GGQ motif associated with peptidyl hydrolysis activity (iv) residues located in the areas supposedly interacting with mRNA and the ribosomal decoding center are highly conserved in RFH, but different from other RFs. RFH lacks the functional, but non-essential domain 1. Yet, RFH-encoding genes are invariably accompanied by a highly conserved gene of unknown function, which is absent in genomes that lack a gene for RFH. The accompanying gene is always located upstream of the RFH gene and with the same orientation. The proximity of the 3' end of the former with the 5' end of the RFH gene makes it likely that their expression is co-regulated via translational coupling. In summary, RFH has the characteristics expected for a class-I RF, but likely with different specificity than RF1 and RF2.
The most puzzling question is which signals RFH recognizes to trigger its release function. Genetic swapping of RFH mRNA recognition components with its RF1 or RF2 counterparts may reveal the nature of RFH signals.
The hypothesis implies a greater versatility of release-factor like activity in the ribosomal A-site than previously appreciated. A closer study of RFH may provide insight into the evolution of the genetic code and of the translational machinery responsible for termination of translation.
This article was reviewed by Daniel Wilson (nominated by Eugene Koonin), Warren Tate (nominated by Eugene Koonin), Yoshikazu Nakamura (nominated by Eugene Koonin) and Eugene Koonin.
虽然所有指定氨基酸的密码子都能被tRNA分子普遍识别,但信号翻译终止的密码子是由一类称为I类释放因子(RF)的蛋白质识别的。在大多数真核生物和古细菌中,单个RF完成对所有三个终止密码子的翻译终止。在大多数细菌中,有两种具有重叠特异性的RF,RF1识别UA(A/G),RF2识别U(A/G)A。
首先,我们假设大肠杆菌K12假基因prfH的直系同源物编码一种我们命名为RFH的第三类I类RF。其次,RFH可能对常规终止密码子以外的信号作出反应。支持这一假设的证据如下:(i)许多细菌基因组含有prfH直系同源物,其开放阅读框没有明显中断。(ii)RFH与其他I类细菌RF具有很强的序列相似性。(iii)RFH含有与肽基水解活性相关的高度保守的GGQ基序。(iv)位于推测与mRNA和核糖体解码中心相互作用区域的残基在RFH中高度保守,但与其他RF不同。RFH缺乏功能性但非必需的结构域1。然而,编码RFH的基因总是伴随着一个功能未知的高度保守基因,而在缺乏RFH基因的基因组中则不存在该基因。伴随基因总是位于RFH基因的上游,且方向相同。前者3'端与RFH基因5'端的接近使得它们的表达可能通过翻译偶联进行共调控。总之,RFH具有I类RF预期的特征,但可能具有与RF1和RF2不同的特异性。
最令人困惑的问题是RFH识别哪些信号来触发其释放功能。将RFH mRNA识别成分与其RF1或RF2对应物进行基因交换可能会揭示RFH信号的本质。
该假设意味着核糖体A位点中释放因子样活性的多样性比以前认识到的更大。对RFH的深入研究可能有助于深入了解遗传密码和负责翻译终止的翻译机制的进化。
本文由丹尼尔·威尔逊(由尤金·库宁提名)、沃伦·泰特(由尤金·库宁提名)、中村义一(由尤金·库宁提名)和尤金·库宁评审。