Hata Masayuki, Marshall Garland R
Center for Computational Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, 700 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2006 May;20(5):321-31. doi: 10.1007/s10822-006-9059-x. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
The role of benzodiazepine derivatives (BZD) as a privileged scaffold that mimics beta-turn structures (Ripka et al. (1993) Tetrahedron 49:3593-3608) in peptide/protein recognition was reexamined in detail. Stable BZD ring conformers were determined with MM3, and experimental reverse-turn structures were extracted from the basis set of protein crystal structures previously defined by Ripka et al. Ideal beta-turns were also modeled and similarly compared with BZD conformers. Huge numbers of conformers were generated by systematically scanning the torsional degrees of freedom for BZDs, as well as those of ideal beta-turns for comparison. Using these structures, conformers of BZDs were fit to experimental structures as suggested by Ripka et al., or modeled classical beta-turn conformers, and the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values were calculated for each pairwise comparison. Pairs of conformers with the smallest RMSD values for overlap of the four alpha-beta side-chain orientations were selected. All overlaps of BZD conformers with experimental beta-turns yielded one or more comparisons where the least RMSD was significantly small, 0.48-0.86 angstroms, as previously suggested. Utilizing a different methodology, the overall conclusion that benzodiazepines could serve as reverse-turn mimetics of Ripka et al. is justified. The least RMSD values for the overlap of BZDs and modeled classical beta-turns were also less than 1 angstrom. When comparing BZDs with experimental or classical beta-turns, the set of experimental beta-turns selected by Ripka et al. fit the BZD scaffolds better than modeled classical beta-turns; however, all the experimental beta-turns did not fit a particular BZD scaffold better. A single BZD ring conformation, and/or chiral orientation, can mimic some, but not all, of the experimental beta-turn structures. BZD has two central ring conformations and one chiral center that explains why the four variations of the BZD scaffold can mimic all types of beta-turn structure examined. It was found, moreover, that the BZD scaffold also mimics each of the nine clusters of experimental orientations of side chains of reverse turns in the Protein Data Bank, when the new classification scheme for the four side-chain directions (the relative orientations of alpha-beta vectors of residues i through i+3) was considered (Tran et al. (2005) J Comput-Aided Mol Des 19:551-566).
详细重新审视了苯二氮䓬衍生物(BZD)作为一种模拟β-转角结构(Ripka等人,(1993年)《四面体》49:3593 - 3608)在肽/蛋白质识别中具有优势的支架的作用。使用MM3确定了稳定的BZD环构象异构体,并从Ripka等人先前定义的蛋白质晶体结构基组中提取了实验性反向转角结构。还对理想的β-转角进行了建模,并与BZD构象异构体进行了类似的比较。通过系统扫描BZD的扭转自由度以及用于比较的理想β-转角的扭转自由度,生成了大量的构象异构体。利用这些结构,按照Ripka等人的建议将BZD的构象异构体与实验结构进行拟合,或对经典的β-转角构象进行建模,并针对每对比较计算均方根偏差(RMSD)值。选择了四个α-β侧链取向重叠时RMSD值最小的构象异构体对。正如之前所表明的,BZD构象异构体与实验性β-转角的所有重叠产生了一个或多个比较,其中最小RMSD非常小,为0.48 - 0.86埃。采用不同的方法,苯二氮䓬可以作为Ripka等人的反向转角模拟物这一总体结论是合理的。BZD与建模的经典β-转角重叠时的最小RMSD值也小于1埃。当将BZD与实验性或经典β-转角进行比较时,Ripka等人选择的实验性β-转角集比建模的经典β-转角更适合BZD支架;然而,并非所有实验性β-转角都比特定的BZD支架拟合得更好。单个BZD环构象和/或手性取向可以模拟一些但不是全部的实验性β-转角结构。BZD有两个中心环构象和一个手性中心,这解释了BZD支架的四种变体为何能够模拟所研究的所有类型的β-转角结构。此外,当考虑四个侧链方向(残基i至i + 3的α-β向量的相对取向)的新分类方案时,发现BZD支架还模拟了蛋白质数据库中反向转角侧链实验取向的九个簇中的每一个(Tran等人,(2005年)《计算机辅助分子设计杂志》19:551 - 566)。