Suppr超能文献

规划与分析适应性成组序贯生存试验

Planning and analyzing adaptive group sequential survival trials.

作者信息

Wassmer Gernot

机构信息

Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Biom J. 2006 Aug;48(4):714-29. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510190.

Abstract

The use of adaptive methods has experienced increasing interest in the current literature on group sequential designs. Group sequential analysis in survival trials usually apply the error spending function approach due to the unpredictable amount of information available in an interim analysis. An alternative way is to apply adaptive methods where additionally the maximum amount of information and other designing parameters can be changed based on the information available at the interim stage. In this paper, it is shown how the inverse normal method can be used within a survival design using the log-rank test for comparing two survival functions. This method allows for many kinds of design modifications. In case of no modifications, the inverse normal method coincides with the commonly used analysis strategy. It is straightforward to specify effect estimates. Confidence intervals for the hazard ratio that can be calculated at each stage of the trial and intervals that can only be computed by the end of the trial are proposed. The latter also enables the calculation of median unbiased estimates. Overall p-values can be defined analogously. Properties of the analyses techniques are investigated and compared with alternative approaches. It is shown that the proposed analysis technique might help to rescue an underpowered study and opens the way to other types of changes in design. The proposed technique is implemented in the software ADDPLAN Adaptive Design, Plans and Analyses (http://www.addplan.com).

摘要

在当前关于成组序贯设计的文献中,自适应方法越来越受到关注。生存试验中的成组序贯分析通常采用误差消耗函数方法,因为中期分析中可用信息的数量不可预测。另一种方法是应用自适应方法,在这种方法中,还可以根据中期阶段获得的信息改变最大信息量和其他设计参数。本文展示了如何在生存设计中使用逆正态方法,利用对数秩检验来比较两个生存函数。这种方法允许进行多种设计修改。在不进行修改的情况下,逆正态方法与常用的分析策略一致。指定效应估计很简单。提出了在试验的每个阶段都可以计算的风险比置信区间以及只能在试验结束时计算的区间。后者还能够计算中位数无偏估计。总体p值可以类似地定义。研究了分析技术的性质,并与其他方法进行了比较。结果表明,所提出的分析技术可能有助于挽救一项效能不足的研究,并为其他类型的设计变更开辟道路。所提出的技术在软件ADDPLAN自适应设计、计划与分析(http://www.addplan.com)中得以实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验