Lightner D J, Lange P H, Reddy P K, Moore L
Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis.
J Urol. 1990 Oct;144(4):921-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39623-4.
We evaluated the location of recurrent disease in 63 patients with carcinoma of the prostate who had abnormal levels of prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.4 ng./ml., Tandem-R assay) 6 to 240 months after radical prostatectomy but who were otherwise considered to be without evidence of disease. The evaluation involved physical examination including digital rectal examinations by 3 urologists, isotopic bone scans, computerized tomography scans of the abdomen and pelvis, cystoscopy, and random needle biopsies of the urethrovesical anastomotic area. In 6 patients metastatic disease to the bone and/or lymph nodes was found and local prostate cancer was discovered in 5. Among 57 patients without evidence of disease by the usual methods of evaluation needle biopsies of the anastomosis revealed local disease in 42%. No local disease was discovered in 30 post-radical prostatectomy patients with normal prostate specific antigen levels. There was a wide range of transrectally palpable contours after radical prostatectomy in patients with and without elevated prostate specific antigen levels. We conclude that prostate specific antigen but not digital rectal examination is an excellent early indicator of possible local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Whether the prevalence of local disease after radical prostatectomy using prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsies of the anastomosis is greater than heretofore has been appreciated will require further study.
