Dess Robert T, Morgan Todd M, Nguyen Paul L, Mehra Rohit, Sandler Howard M, Feng Felix Y, Spratt Daniel E
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jul;18(7):55. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0700-0.
Radical prostatectomy (RP) is now the most common definitive treatment for high-risk prostate cancer. Unfortunately, many men will have residual microscopic disease after surgery alone. Despite level 1 evidence supporting the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), <10% of men with adverse pathology (positive margins or T3 disease) receive ART in the USA. Early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT) at the time of biochemical recurrence has been proposed as an alternative strategy despite the lack of published randomized trials to support this approach. Multiple randomized trials are ongoing or recently completed to compare ART to eSRT, but given the long natural history of prostate cancer, long-term oncologic outcomes from these trials will not be reported for several years. In this review, we discuss the shifting trends in the diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer given a decline in PSA screening, use of RP for high-risk disease, and compare and contrast the retrospective and randomized evidence regarding ART and SRT.
根治性前列腺切除术(RP)目前是高危前列腺癌最常见的确定性治疗方法。不幸的是,许多男性仅手术后仍会有残留的微小病灶。尽管有一级证据支持辅助放疗(ART)的使用,但在美国,病理结果不良(切缘阳性或T3期疾病)的男性中接受ART治疗的不到10%。尽管缺乏已发表的随机试验来支持这种方法,但在生化复发时进行早期挽救性放疗(eSRT)已被提出作为一种替代策略。多项随机试验正在进行或最近已完成,以比较ART与eSRT,但鉴于前列腺癌的自然病程较长,这些试验的长期肿瘤学结果在数年内不会公布。在本综述中,我们讨论了鉴于PSA筛查的下降,高危前列腺癌诊断的变化趋势、RP用于高危疾病的情况,并比较和对比了关于ART和SRT的回顾性和随机证据。