Atienzar Franck A, Jha Awadhesh N
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, UK.
Mutat Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;613(2-3):76-102. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
More than 9000 papers using the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) or related techniques (e.g. the arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR)) have been published from 1990 to 2005. The RAPD method has been initially used to detect polymorphism in genetic mapping, taxonomy and phylogenetic studies and later in genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies. Despite their extensive use, these techniques have also attracted some criticisms, mainly for lack of reproducibility. In the light of their widespread applications, the objectives of this review are to (1) identify the potential factors affecting the optimisation of the RAPD and AP-PCR assays, (2) critically describe and analyse these techniques in genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies, (3) compare the RAPD assay with other well used methodologies, (4) further elucidate the impact of DNA damage and mutations on the RAPD profiles, and finally (5) provide some recommendations/guidelines to further improve the applications of the assays and to help the identification of the factors responsible for the RAPD changes. It is suggested that after proper optimisation, the RAPD is a reliable, sensitive and reproducible assay, has the potential to detect a wide range of DNA damage (e.g. DNA adducts, DNA breakage) as well as mutations (point mutations and large rearrangements) and therefore can be applied to genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the changes in RAPD profiles is difficult since many factors can affect the generation of RAPD profiles. It is therefore important that these factors are identified and taken into account while using these assays. On the other hand, further analyses of the relevant bands generated in RAPD profile allow not only to identify some of the molecular events implicated in the genomic instability but also to discover genes playing key roles, particularly in the initiation and development of malignancy. Finally, to elucidate the potential genotoxic effects of environmental contaminants, a powerful strategy could be firstly to use the RAPD assay as a screening method and secondly to apply more specific methods measuring for instance DNA adducts, gene mutations or cytogenetic effects. It is also envisaged that these assays (i.e. RAPD and related techniques), which reflect effects at whole genome level, would continue to complement the use of emerging technologies (e.g. microarrays which aim to quantify expression of individual genes).
从1990年到2005年,已经发表了9000多篇使用随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)或相关技术(如任意引物聚合酶链反应(AP-PCR))的论文。RAPD方法最初用于检测遗传图谱、分类学和系统发育研究中的多态性,后来用于遗传毒性和致癌作用研究。尽管这些技术被广泛使用,但也引起了一些批评,主要是因为缺乏可重复性。鉴于它们的广泛应用,本综述的目的是:(1)确定影响RAPD和AP-PCR分析优化的潜在因素;(2)批判性地描述和分析这些技术在遗传毒性和致癌作用研究中的应用;(3)将RAPD分析与其他常用方法进行比较;(4)进一步阐明DNA损伤和突变对RAPD图谱的影响;最后(5)提供一些建议/指南,以进一步改进这些分析方法的应用,并有助于确定导致RAPD变化的因素。有人认为,经过适当优化后,RAPD是一种可靠、灵敏且可重复的分析方法,有潜力检测多种DNA损伤(如DNA加合物、DNA断裂)以及突变(点突变和大片段重排),因此可应用于遗传毒性和致癌作用研究。然而,由于许多因素会影响RAPD图谱的产生,因此对RAPD图谱变化的解释很困难。因此,在使用这些分析方法时,识别并考虑这些因素很重要。另一方面,对RAPD图谱中产生的相关条带进行进一步分析,不仅可以识别一些与基因组不稳定有关的分子事件,还可以发现起关键作用的基因,特别是在恶性肿瘤的发生和发展过程中。最后,为了阐明环境污染物的潜在遗传毒性作用,一个有效的策略可以是首先使用RAPD分析作为筛选方法,其次应用更具体的方法,例如测量DNA加合物、基因突变或细胞遗传学效应。还可以设想,这些反映全基因组水平效应的分析方法(即RAPD和相关技术)将继续补充新兴技术(如旨在量化单个基因表达的微阵列)的使用。