Sonder Gerard J B, van den Hoek Anneke, Regez Rosa M, Brinkman Kees, Prins Jan M, Mulder Jan-Willem, Veenstra Jan, Claessen Frans A, Coutinho Roel A
GGD Amsterdam, Municipal Health Service Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sex Transm Dis. 2007 May;34(5):288-93. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000237838.43716.ee.
The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) requests after sexual exposure, compliance, and outcome of follow-up HIV tests.
The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all HIV PEP requests after sexual exposure between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004, in Amsterdam.
In 5 years, there was a very modest increase in PEP requests, of which most (75%) came from men who have sex with men (MSM). Although 70% reported side effects, 85% completed their PEP course. Sexual assault victims less often completed their course (odds ratio [OR] = 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05-0.4, P = 0.001). People who used HIV PEP more often complied with follow-up tests than people who did not use PEP (OR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.6-7.9, P = 0.002). One HIV seroconversion was found caused by a later exposure than that for which PEP was given.
Despite a widely available PEP program in Amsterdam, the number of PEP requests remained low. Most people completed their PEP course; compliance with follow-up HIV testing was high.
本研究的目的是评估性接触后艾滋病病毒暴露后预防(PEP)的申请趋势、依从性以及后续艾滋病病毒检测结果。
作者对2000年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间阿姆斯特丹所有性接触后艾滋病病毒PEP申请进行了回顾性分析。
5年间,PEP申请有非常适度的增加,其中大部分(75%)来自男男性行为者(MSM)。尽管70%报告有副作用,但85%完成了PEP疗程。性侵犯受害者完成疗程的情况较少(优势比[OR]=0.1;95%置信区间[CI]=0.05 - 0.4,P = 0.001)。使用艾滋病病毒PEP的人比未使用PEP的人更常遵守后续检测(OR = 3.5;95%CI = 1.6 - 7.9,P = 0.002)。发现1例艾滋病病毒血清转化是由比给予PEP时更晚的暴露引起的。
尽管阿姆斯特丹有广泛可用的PEP项目,但PEP申请数量仍然较低。大多数人完成了PEP疗程;对后续艾滋病病毒检测的依从性较高。